Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 209-222, February 2010

Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Faten F. AbdelHafez

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • Nina Desai

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Ahmed M. Abou-Setta

      Affiliations

    • Private Clinic, Pyramids, Giza, Egypt
    • Present address: Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
  • ,
  • Tommaso Falcone

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA
  • ,
  • James Goldfarb

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA

Received 5 March 2009; received in revised form 16 April 2009; accepted 21 September 2009. published online 28 December 2009.

Declaration: The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.

Abstract 

Embryo cryopreservation is an important aspect of assisted reproduction. Many methods have been described, but they have been poorly investigated in randomized trials, highlighting the need for a systematic review of the literature. Meticulous electronic/hand searches were performed to locate randomized trials (RCT) comparing embryo cryopreservation methods. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and incidence of congenital abnormalities. Secondary outcomes included live-birth (LBR), ongoing pregnancy (OPR), implantation (IR), and miscarriage (MR) rates. Data were extracted to allow for an intention-to-treat analysis and analysed using a random-effects model. Literature search revealed 11 RCT, of which five were excluded. The quality of the included studies was variable, but generally poor. There was a significantly higher CPR, OPR and IR with vitrification compared with slow freezing (odds ratio (OR)=1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.03–2.32, OR=1.82, 95% CI=1.04–3.20 and OR=1.49, 95% CI=1.03–2.15, respectively). In addition, there was a significantly lower CPR and OPR with embryo ultra-rapid freezing compared with slow freezing (OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.16–0.76 and OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.17–0.81, respectively). Vitrification is superior to slow freezing, which in turn is superior to ultra-rapid freezing. However, more well-designed and powered studies are needed to further corroborate these findings.

Keywords: cryopreservation, embryo, slow freezing, ultra-rapid freezing, vitrification

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr Nina Desai received her doctorate in cell biology from the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (1984). She served as IVF Laboratory Director at Ohio State and later at University Hospital, Case Western Reserve, Cleveland, Ohio. Dr Desai was invited to join the Cleveland Clinic Foundation in 2000 as Director of IVF and Clinical Research. She is also an Assistant Professor at the Lerner College of Medicine, Case Western Reserve. Her research interests include non-invasive markers of embryonic potential, growth factor modulation of embryonic differentiation, apoptosis, stem cell derivation and vitrification of embryo, oocytes and isolated follicles.

PII: S1472-6483(09)00226-0

doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.013

Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume 20, Issue 2 , Pages 209-222, February 2010