Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 350-357, March 2010

Outcomes after early or midfollicular phase LH supplementation in previous inadequate responders

  • M. Sönmezer

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
    • Center for Research on Human Reproduction (USAUM), Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • C. İltemir Duvan

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Fatih University, Istanbul, Turkey
  • ,
  • B. Özmen

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
    • Center for Research on Human Reproduction (USAUM), Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • T. Taşçı

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • S. Özkavukçu

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
    • Center for Research on Human Reproduction (USAUM), Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
  • ,
  • C.S. Atabekoğlu

      Affiliations

    • IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
    • Center for Research on Human Reproduction (USAUM), Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey

Received 26 February 2009; received in revised form 18 March 2009; accepted 16 November 2009. published online 21 January 2010.

Declaration: The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.

Abstract 

Second cycle outcomes of 75 patients who had previous inadequate ovarian response with recombinant FSH (rFSH)-only ovarian stimulation during gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue (GnRHa) down-regulated cycles were evaluated retrospectively. In these second cycles, both rFSH and human menopausal gonadotrophin (HMG) in GnRHa long down-regulation were given to all patients, HMG initiated either on day 1 (group A, n=37) or day 5–6 of the ovarian stimulation (group B, n=38). Total HMG dose was higher (1198±514 IU versus 726±469IU; P<0.001), cumulative rFSH consumption was lower (1823±804 IU versus 2863±1393IU; P=0.001) and duration of stimulation was shorter (8.94±1.15days versus 10.37±1.80days; P<0.001) in group A than in group B. No significant differences were found regarding fertilization, implantation or pregnancy rates and embryo quality between the groups. Further analysis by supplementary HMG dose (75IU versus 150IU) revealed that total gonadotrophin and HMG consumption was lower in 75IU-supplemented subgroups. Notably, pregnancy rate was higher in patients where 75IU HMG was supplemented on day 5–6 of ovarian stimulation, which deserves further evaluation.

Keywords: HMG, ICSI, luteal GnRH agonist protocol, rFSH, suboptimal ovarian response

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Dr Sonmezer has been working on reproductive medicine at Ankara University, School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Center for Research on Human Reproduction. He completed a research doctorate program on assisted reproduction at the University of Cornell-USA under the supervision of Professor Dr Kutluk Oktay. He is interested in human oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation, sperm DNA damage and ovulation induction in poor responders.

PII: S1472-6483(09)00275-2

doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.11.022

Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume 20, Issue 3 , Pages 350-357, March 2010