Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume 20, Issue 5 , Pages 649-655, May 2010

Pronuclear morphology, embryo development and chromosome constitution

  • Gemma Arroyo

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
  • ,
  • Josep Santaló

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Cellular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Mònica Parriego

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Montse Boada

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Pedro N. Barri

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
  • ,
  • Anna Veiga

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
    • Stem Cell Bank, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Barcelona, Spain

Received 28 July 2009; received in revised form 21 September 2009; accepted 16 December 2009. published online 08 March 2010.

Declaration: The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.

Abstract 

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of pronuclear patterns, according to the classifications of Tesarik and Scott, as predictors of embryo chromosome constitution. Up to 73 preimplantation genetic diagnosis/preimplantation genetic screening (PGD/PGS) cycles were analysed in this retrospective study including 17 cycles of translocation carriers and 56 PGS cycles. A total of 331 biopsied embryos were studied assessing pronuclear (PN) pattern, embryo quality and chromosome constitution. As regards to the relationship between PN pattern and embryo quality, the data obtained in this study show no correlation between both parameters. Although there were no significant differences when comparing the distribution of chromosomally normal and abnormal embryos with respect to embryo quality, such differences were observed when distinguishing between normal, aneuploid and polyploid embryos. The results show that the PN pattern using Tesarik’s and Scott’s classification systems is not related to the embryo developmental potential or its chromosome constitution. Therefore, in the context of a PGD/PGS programme, the PN pattern cannot be used as a tool to predict embryo quality or chromosome status.

Keywords: chromosome abnormalities, embryo quality, pronuclear pattern

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Gemma Arroyo obtained her degree in Biology from the Universidad de Barcelona, and her Master’s degree in Reproductive Biology and Assisted Reproduction Techniques in 1999 from the Institut Universitari Dexeus – Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. She also has a BSc in Cellular Biology (2003) from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. She has been working at the IVF laboratory at Institut Universitari Dexeus since 1999. She is an active member of the Association for the Study of Reproductive Biology and the Spanish Society of Fertility. Her main interest is focused on oocyte maturation in vitro, and oocyte and early embryo morphology.

PII: S1472-6483(10)00043-X

doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.12.028

Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume 20, Issue 5 , Pages 649-655, May 2010