Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume 20, Issue 5 , Pages 649-655 , May 2010

Pronuclear morphology, embryo development and chromosome constitution

  • Gemma Arroyo

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author.
    • ,
  • Josep Santaló

      Affiliations

    • Unit of Cellular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
    • ,
  • Mònica Parriego

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
    • ,
  • Montse Boada

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
    • ,
  • Pedro N. Barri

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
    • ,
  • Anna Veiga

      Affiliations

    • Reproductive Medicine Service, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain
    • Stem Cell Bank, Centre for Regenerative Medicine, Barcelona, Spain

Received 28 July 2009 ,Revised 21 September 2009 ,Accepted 16 December 2009.

References 

  1. Alikani M, Cohen J, Tomkin G, et al. Human embryo fragmentation in vitro and its implications for pregnancy and implantation. Fertil. Steril. 1999;71:836–847
  2. American Society for Reproductive Medicine: the Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine 2008 Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil. Steril. 90 (Suppl. 3), 163–164.
  3. Arroyo G, Veiga A, Santaló J, et al. Developmental prognosis for zygotes based on pronuclear pattern: usefulness of pronuclear scoring. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2007;24:173–181
  4. Balaban B. Pronuclear morphology predicts embryo development and chromosome constitution. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2004;8:695–700
  5. Balaban B, Urman B, Isiklar A, et al. The effect of pronuclear morphology on embryo quality parameters and blastocyst transfer outcome. Hum. Reprod. 2001;16:2357–2361
  6. Balakier H, Cadesky K. The frequency and developmental capability of human embryos containing multinucleated blastomeres. Hum. Reprod. 1997;12:800–804
  7. Barri PN, Martinez F, Coroleu B, et al. The role of GnRH antagonists in assisted reproduction. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2002;5(Suppl. 1):14–19
  8. Boada M, Carrera M, De la Iglesia C, et al. Successful use of a laser for human embryo biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis: report of two cases. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 1998;15:302–307
  9. Boiso I, Veiga A, Edwards RG. Fundamentals of human embryonic growth in vitro and the selection of high-quality embryos for transfer. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2002;5:328–350
  10. Chen C, Shen G, Horng S, et al. The relationship of pronuclear stage morphology and chromosome status at cleavage stage. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2003;20:413–420
  11. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology: ESHRE Guidelines for Reproductive Medicine Magli, M.C., Etienne Van den Abbeel, E., Lundin, K., Royere, D., Van der Elst, J., Gianaroli, L. for Committee of the Special Interest Group on Embryology, 2008. Hum. Reprod. 6, 1253–1262.
  12. Gámiz P, Rubio C, de los Santos MJ, et al. The effect of pronuclear morphology on early development and chromosome abnormalities in cleavage-stage embryos. Hum. Reprod. 2003;18:2413–2419
  13. Gardner DK, Lane M. Towards a single embryo transfer. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2003;6:470–481
  14. Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti AP, et al. Pronuclear morphology and chromosomal abnormalities as scoring criteria for embryo selection. Fertil. Steril. 2003;80:341–349
  15. Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti AP, et al. Oocyte euploidity, pronuclear zygote morphology and chromosomal complement. Hum. Reprod. 2007;22:241–249
  16. James A, Hennessy S, Reggio B, et al. The limited importance of pronuclear scoring of human zygotes. Hum. Reprod. 2006;21:1599–1604
  17. Jaroudi K, Al-Hassan S, Sieck U, et al. Zygote transfer on day 1 versus cleavage stage embryo transfer on day 3: a prospective randomized trial. Hum. Reprod. 2004;19:645–648
  18. Kahraman S, Kumtepe Y, Sertyel S, et al. Pronuclear morphology scoring and chromosomal status of embryos in severe male infertility. Hum. Reprod. 2002;17:3193–3200
  19. Ludwig M, Schopper B, Al-Hasani S, et al. Clinical use of a pronuclear stage score following intracytoplasmic sperm injection: impact on pregnancy rates under the conditions of the German embryo law. Hum. Reprod. 2000;15:325–329
  20. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Munné S, et al. Incidence of chromosomal abnormalities from a morphologically normal cohort of embryos in poor-prognosis patients. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 1998;15:297–301
  21. Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP, et al. Embryo morphology and development are dependent on the chromosomal complement. Fertil. Steril. 2007;87:534–541
  22. Magli MC, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, et al. Double locus analysis of chromosome 21 for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Prenat. Diagn. 2001;21:1080–1085
  23. Márquez C, Sandalinas M, Bahçe M, et al. Chromosome abnormalities in 1255 cleavage-stage human embryos. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2000;1:17–27
  24. Munné S, Cohen J. Chromosome abnormalities in human embryos. Hum. Reprod. Update. 1998;4:842–855
  25. Munné S. Chromosome abnormalities and their relationship to morphology and development of human embryos. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2006;12:234–253
  26. Nicoli A, Valli B, Di Girolamo R, et al. Limited importance of pre-embryo pronuclear morphology (zygote score) in assisted reproduction outcome in the absence of embryo cryopreservation. Fertil. Steril. 2007;88:1167–1173
  27. Payne JF, Raburn DJ, Couchman GM, et al. Relationship between pre-embryo pronuclear morphology (zygote score) and standard day 2 or 3 embryo morphology with regard to assisted reproductive technique outcomes. Fertil. Steril. 2005;84:900–909
  28. Sadowy S, Tomkin G, Munné S, et al. Impaired development of zygotes with uneven pronuclear size. Zygote. 1998;6:137–141
  29. Salumets A, Hydén-Granskog C, Suikkari A-M, et al. The predictive value of pronuclear morphology of zygotes in the assessment of human embryo quality. Hum. Reprod. 2001;16:2177–2181
  30. Scott L. Pronuclear scoring as a predictor of embryo development. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2003;6:470–481
  31. Scott L, Smith S. The successful of pronuclear embryo transfers the day following oocyte retrieval. Hum. Reprod. 1998;13:1003–1013
  32. Scott L, Alvero R, Leondires M, et al. The morphology of human pronuclear embryos is positively related to blastocyst development and implantation. Hum. Reprod. 2000;15:2394–2403
  33. Scott L, Finn A, O’Leary T, et al. Morphologic parameters of early cleavage-stage embryos that correlate with fetal development and delivery: prospective and applied data for increased pregnancy rates. Hum. Reprod. 2007;22:230–240
  34. Tesarik J, Greco E. The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology. Hum. Reprod. 1999;14:1318–1323
  35. Van Blerkom J. Mitochondria as regulatory forces in oocytes, preimplantation embryos and stem cells. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2008;16:553–569
  36. Van Blerkom J, Davis P. High-polarized (ΔΨmHIGH) mitochondria are spatially polarized in human oocytes and early embryos in stable subplasmalemmal domains: developmental significance and the concept of vanguard mitochondria. Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2006;13:246–254
  37. Vidal F, Giménez C, Rubio C, et al. FISH preimplantation diagnosis of chromosome aneuploidity in recurrent pregnancy wastage. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 1998;15:310–313
  38. Wittemer C, Bettahar-Lebugle K, Ohl J, et al. Zygote evaluation: and efficient tool for embryo selection. Hum. Reprod. 2000;15:2591–2597
  39. Zollner U, Zollner K-P, Hartl G, et al. The use of a detailed zygote score after IVF/ICSI to obtain good quality blastocysts: the German experience. Hum. Reprod. 2002;17:1327–1333

 Gemma Arroyo obtained her degree in Biology from the Universidad de Barcelona, and her Master’s degree in Reproductive Biology and Assisted Reproduction Techniques in 1999 from the Institut Universitari Dexeus – Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. She also has a BSc in Cellular Biology (2003) from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. She has been working at the IVF laboratory at Institut Universitari Dexeus since 1999. She is an active member of the Association for the Study of Reproductive Biology and the Spanish Society of Fertility. Her main interest is focused on oocyte maturation in vitro, and oocyte and early embryo morphology.

PII: S1472-6483(10)00043-X

doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2009.12.028

Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Volume 20, Issue 5 , Pages 649-655 , May 2010

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution