Abstract
This study investigated the effects of long-term (24 h) in-vitro sperm incubation at room temperature (RT; 23°C) versus testis temperature (35°C) on various sperm-quality parameters. Semen samples (n = 41) were prepared both by density-gradient centrifugation (DGC) and the swim-up technique in order to compare the influence of sperm preparation on sperm quality after incubation. Progressive motility and morphology were significantly higher after incubation at RT compared with 35°C (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). The proportions of acrosome-reacted, apoptotic and dead spermatozoa were significantly lower in samples incubated for 24 h at RT compared with 35°C (P < 0.001, P = 0.01 and P < 0.001, respectively). The number of motile, morphologically normal, non-acrosome-reacted and nonapoptotic spermatozoa recovered after sperm preparation was significantly higher in DGC compared with swim-up samples (P < 0.001). However, spermatozoa prepared by swim-up showed better survival after incubation compared with DGC-prepared spermatozoa, especially when incubated at 35°C. In conclusion, this study indicates a significantly better and longer preservation of sperm quality when incubation is performed at RT. These findings may convince laboratories to change the routinely used sperm storage conditions in order to maximize the quality of the prepared sperm sample.
A clinical study was performed in order to compare the influence of different sperm preparation techniques and incubation temperatures on the survival and quality of spermatozoa. A total of 41 semen samples were prepared with two different semen preparation techniques. One technique involved centrifugation of the sample through different gradient layers in order to select the most motile and morphologically normal spermatozoa. The other preparation technique relied on the sperm’s capability to swim out of the semen into a layer of culture medium: this way, only motile sperm cells were selected. Afterwards, aliquots of both sperm preparations were incubated for 24 h at room temperature (23°C) or testis temperature (35°C) in order to compare the influence of incubation temperature on the survival and quality of the spermatozoa. A total of six sperm-quality parameters were checked at different stages of sperm preparation and incubation. Conventional sperm-quality parameters like concentration, progressive motility, normal morphology and viability were taken into account. Additionally, sperm function was analysed by determining the percentage of spontaneously acrosome-reacted and apoptotic spermatozoa in the sample. In conclusion, our results showed a significantly better and longer preservation of sperm quality when incubation was at room temperature. The findings presented by this study may convince laboratories to change the routinely used sperm storage conditions in order to maximize the quality of the prepared sperm sample.
Introduction
Sperm quality is a very important factor in the IVF laboratory since male infertility accounts for 20–30% of the infertility cases (
) and treatment options are mainly based on sperm-quality improvement techniques (
). The sperm-quality parameters routinely used in the IVF laboratory are concentration, motility, viability and morphology (
Ombelet et al., 1997a- Ombelet W.
- Bosmans E.
- Janssen M.
- Cox A.
- Vlasselaer J.
- Gyselaers W.
- Vandeput H.
- Gielen J.
- Pollet H.
- Maes M.
- Steeno O.
- Kruger T.
Semen parameters in a fertile versus subfertile population: a need for change in the interpretation of semen testing.
,
). However, sperm-function assessments could additionally provide a valuable indication of sperm quality. Fertilization of an oocyte with an apoptotic spermatozoon has been shown to have detrimental effects on fertilization rate, implantation rate and embryo survival in assisted reproduction treatment (
de Vantery Arrighi et al., 2009- de Vantery Arrighi C.
- Lucas H.
- Chardonnens D.
- de Agostini A.
Removal of spermatozoa with externalized phosphatidylserine from sperm preparation in human assisted medical procreation: effects on viability, motility and mitochondrial membrane potential.
). Furthermore, occurrence of the acrosome reaction is essential to achieve fertilization in intrauterine insemination (
Grunewald et al., 2006- Grunewald S.
- Baumann T.
- Paasch U.
- Glander H.J.
Capacitation and acrosome reaction in nonapoptotic human spermatozoa.
). Both of these sperm-function parameters can be easily determined by use of flow cytometry; however, this technique is not routinely available in the IVF laboratory.
The quality of the sperm sample is influenced by various laboratory factors, including: (i) use of different sperm preparation techniques (
Boomsma et al., 2007- Boomsma C.M.
- Heineman M.J.
- Cohlen B.J.
- Farquhar C.
Semen preparation techniques for intrauterine insemination.
,
Chen and Bongso, 1999Comparative evaluation of two density gradient preparations for sperm separation for medically assisted conception.
,
Marchesi et al., 2010- Marchesi D.E.
- Biederman H.
- Ferrara S.
- Hershlag A.
- Feng H.L.
The effect of semen processing on sperm DNA integrity: comparison of two techniques using the novel Toluidine Blue Assay.
); (ii) temperature during sperm preparation (
Franken et al., 2011- Franken D.R.
- van Wyk R.
- Stoumann C.
- Avari K.
Temperature controlled centrifugation improves sperm retrieval.
,
Otsuki et al., 2008- Otsuki J.
- Chuko M.
- Momma Y.
- Takahashi K.
- Nagai Y.
A comparison of the swim-up procedure at body and testis temperatures.
); (iii) time interval from sperm preparation to IUI (
Yavas and Selub, 2004Intrauterine insemination (IUI) pregnancy outcome is enhanced by shorter intervals from semen collection to sperm wash, from sperm wash to IUI time, and from semen collection to IUI time.
); and (iv) temperature during long-term in-vitro incubation of prepared sperm samples (
Aitken et al., 1996- Aitken R.J.
- Allan I.W.
- Irvine D.S.
- Macnamee M.
Studies on the development of diluents for the transportation and storage of human semen at ambient temperature.
,
Makler et al., 1981- Makler A.
- Deutch M.
- Vilensky A.
- Palti Y.
Factors affecting sperm motility. VIII. Velocity and survival of human spermatozoa as related to temperatures above zero.
,
Matsuura et al., 2010- Matsuura R.
- Takeuchi T.
- Yoshida A.
Preparation and incubation conditions affect the DNA integrity of ejaculated human spermatozoa.
,
Petrella et al., 2003- Petrella C.
- Hsieh J.
- Blake E.
- Thrift K.
- Zacur H.
- Zhao Y.
Human sperm can survive at room temperature for weeks: Measured by motility and viability of sperm maintained under various conditions.
). It is well known that the testis temperature is approximately 2–3°C below body temperature (
), as this is required for the production and maintenance of viable spermatozoa (
Appell et al., 1977- Appell R.A.
- Evans P.R.
- Blandy J.P.
The effect of temperature on the motility and viability of sperm.
,
). Despite the numerous articles published on the harmful effects of long-term in-vitro sperm incubation at body temperature, it is still current practice in most IVF laboratories to store prepared sperm samples at this unfavourable temperature prior to their use in assisted reproduction treatment (
Matsuura et al., 2010- Matsuura R.
- Takeuchi T.
- Yoshida A.
Preparation and incubation conditions affect the DNA integrity of ejaculated human spermatozoa.
).
Therefore, this study aimed to examine the effects of long-term (24 h) in-vitro sperm incubation at room temperature (RT; 23°C) versus testis temperature (35°C) on various sperm-quality parameters. In order to compare the influence of sperm preparation on sperm quality, native semen samples were split and prepared either by density-gradient centrifugation (DGC) or the swim-up technique. Conventional sperm-quality parameters such as concentration, progressive motility, normal morphology and viability (
) were taken into account. Additionally, sperm function was analysed by determining the proportions of spontaneously acrosome-reacted and apoptotic spermatozoa in the sample via flow cytometry.
Discussion
The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in sperm-quality parameters after long-term (24 h) in-vitro sperm incubation at RT (23°C) versus testis temperature (35°C). Parameters that were taken into account to define a high-quality sample were concentration, progressive motility, normal morphology, viability, acrosome reaction and the presence of apoptotic spermatozoa in the sample. A total of 41 semen samples, with a sperm concentration of ⩾15 million/ml and progressive motility of ⩾32% (
), were analysed.
The results presented in this study showed a significantly better and longer preservation of sperm quality when samples were incubated at RT compared with 35°C. This was in accordance with results proposed by
Schuffner et al., 2002- Schuffner A.
- Morshedi M.
- Vaamonde D.
- Duran E.H.
- Oehninger S.
Effect of different incubation conditions on phosphatidylserine externalization and motion parameters of purified fractions of highly motile human spermatozoa.
, who reported a significant loss of motility and an increased incidence of apoptosis after incubation at 37°C. Furthermore,
Aitken et al., 1996- Aitken R.J.
- Allan I.W.
- Irvine D.S.
- Macnamee M.
Studies on the development of diluents for the transportation and storage of human semen at ambient temperature.
showed a significant decline in the motility of spermatozoa after incubation at ambient temperatures (i.e. 22°C), although incubation had no effect on the viability of the spermatozoa or their potential to undergo the acrosome reaction. It is assumed that when spermatozoa are incubated at lower temperatures, they adopt a resting state, which allows them to preserve their energy. In 2009, Gallup proposed ‘the activation hypothesis’ as a mechanism of spermatozoa capacitation
in vivo. He postulated that the rise in temperature when spermatozoa enter the female reproductive tract could act as a trigger for the activation of spermatozoa, making them hyperactive (
Gallup, 2009On the origin of descended scrotal testicles: the activation hypothesis.
). This hypothesis possibly explains the diminished survival of spermatozoa at 37°C compared with lower temperatures. Finally, in addition to the previous sperm parameters, normal morphology of the spermatozoa also decreased significantly after incubation and especially after incubation at 35°C. The change in morphological characteristics has not been recorded during this study. However, an indication for this was found in a study by
Peer et al., 2007- Peer S.
- Eltes F.
- Berkovitz A.
- Yehuda R.
- Itsykson P.
- Bartoov B.
Is fine morphology of the human sperm nuclei affected by in-vitro incubation at 37 degrees C?.
, who reported that in-vitro incubation of sperm samples for ⩾2 h at 37°C caused the appearance of large nuclear vacuoles, an effect which was not seen after incubation at 21°C.
Comparison between DGC and swim-up samples after incubation showed a superior preservation of sperm quality in swim-up samples. A possible explanation could be that the centrifugation steps performed during DGC sperm preparation rendered the spermatozoa more vulnerable to certain incubation conditions compared with the more natural selection of spermatozoa by the swim-up technique. Additionally, the higher concentration of spermatozoa, and therefore the higher number of dead sperm cells, in DGC-prepared samples compared with swim-up could have resulted in greater amounts of reactive oxygen species present in DGC-prepared samples. High reactive oxygen species production may induce peroxidative damage and a loss of sperm function (
Calamera et al., 2001- Calamera J.C.
- Fernandez P.J.
- Buffone M.G.
- Acosta A.A.
- Doncel G.F.
Effects of long-term in-vitro incubation of human spermatozoa: functional parameters and catalase effect.
,
). DNA damage in both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes may also be generated, leading to a more rapid decline in sperm viability. Therefore, when sperm samples are to be incubated in-vitro for an extended period of time (i.e. 24 h) it is recommended to use the swim-up technique for preparation of the sample.
The results indicated that both preparation techniques provided a significantly better sperm population compared with the native sample. However, no solid conclusion could be drawn whether one technique provided a qualitatively better sperm population compared with the other. Firstly, both techniques selected equally for progressively motile spermatozoa and DGC-prepared samples showed higher proportions of morphologically normal spermatozoa compared with swim-up. This was in contrast to results presented by
Evliyaoglu et al., 1996- Evliyaoglu Y.
- Ciftci U.
- Bozdemir N.
Spermatozoa selection by the swim-up procedure and two-layer percoll gradient centrifugation.
and
Ng et al., 1992- Ng F.L.
- Liu D.Y.
- Baker H.W.
Comparison of Percoll, mini-Percoll and swim-up methods for sperm preparation from abnormal semen samples.
, who demonstrated a higher proportion of progressively motile spermatozoa in Percoll-selected samples and more morphologically normal spermatozoa in swim-up compared with Percoll-selected samples. Secondly, in accordance with the results presented by
Evliyaoglu et al., 1996- Evliyaoglu Y.
- Ciftci U.
- Bozdemir N.
Spermatozoa selection by the swim-up procedure and two-layer percoll gradient centrifugation.
and
Ng et al., 1992- Ng F.L.
- Liu D.Y.
- Baker H.W.
Comparison of Percoll, mini-Percoll and swim-up methods for sperm preparation from abnormal semen samples.
, DGC yielded a significantly higher amount of spermatozoa compared with swim-up, whereby swim-up-selected samples showed a tendency towards a higher proportion of intact acrosomes. Thirdly, swim-up preparations also resulted in a significantly higher proportion of nonapoptotic and viable spermatozoa in the sample compared with DGC. The swim-up technique is a low-cost procedure and is less time consuming in comparison to DGC. However, selection of spermatozoa by swim-up is based on motility and consequently dependent on a sufficient number of motile spermatozoa in the sample. Therefore, in assisted reproduction treatment it is usually recommended to use DGC as it can also be modulated to prepare severe quality sperm samples (
Nijs, 2009Nijs, M., 2009. Study of Sperm Parameters in Assisted Reproduction Outcome. PhD Thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
).
Various reports (
Jackson et al., 2010- Jackson R.E.
- Bormann C.L.
- Hassun P.A.
- Rocha A.M.
- Motta E.L.
- Serafini P.C.
- Smith G.D.
Effects of semen storage and separation techniques on sperm DNA fragmentation.
,
Lachaud et al., 2004- Lachaud C.
- Tesarik J.
- Canadas M.L.
- Mendoza C.
Apoptosis and necrosis in human ejaculated spermatozoa.
,
Petrella et al., 2003- Petrella C.
- Hsieh J.
- Blake E.
- Thrift K.
- Zacur H.
- Zhao Y.
Human sperm can survive at room temperature for weeks: Measured by motility and viability of sperm maintained under various conditions.
) showed no significant changes in sperm parameters evaluated after 4–6 h of incubation at both room and body temperatures. However, sperm parameters did change significantly after 24 h of storage in all three investigations. Furthermore, long-term in-vitro incubation of spermatozoa could serve multiple purposes. Firstly, according to
Eskandar, 2002Is 24-h sperm motility a useful IVF measure when male infertility is not apparent?.
, zero 24-h sperm motility is related to a lower fertilization rate and a higher incidence of failed fertilization. Secondly, preservation of sperm quality for up to 24 h could be used for in-vitro maturation of immature metaphase I oocytes for intracytoplasmic sperm injection to be performed the following day (
Strassburger et al., 2004- Strassburger D.
- Friedler S.
- Raziel A.
- Kasterstein E.
- Schachter M.
- Ron-El R.
The outcome of ICSI of immature MI oocytes and rescued in-vitro matured MII oocytes.
). Thirdly,
Aitken et al., 1996- Aitken R.J.
- Allan I.W.
- Irvine D.S.
- Macnamee M.
Studies on the development of diluents for the transportation and storage of human semen at ambient temperature.
suggested 24-h storage of sperm samples at ambient temperature (i.e. 22°C) to allow transportation to a centralized, accredited, diagnostic laboratory in order to standardize laboratory assessments of semen quality in the context of multicentre clinical trials.
In conclusion, the results of this study show a significantly better preservation of sperm quality when samples are incubated for 24 h at RT compared with 35°C. However, further investigation is needed to confirm whether these results would also translate into an improvement in pregnancy rates if prepared sperm samples were to be stored at RT before their use in assisted reproduction treatment. Currently, a study is being performed in this study centre whereby prepared sperm samples are alternately incubated at RT or 37 ± 0.5°C before their use in IUI. Finally, the findings presented in this study may convince laboratories to change the routinely used sperm storage conditions in order to maximize the quality of the prepared sperm sample.
Article info
Publication history
Published online: January 16, 2014
Accepted:
December 17,
2013
Received in revised form:
December 16,
2013
Received:
June 4,
2013
Declaration: The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Annelies Thijssen graduated in July 2012 with a Masters in biomedical sciences – clinical molecular sciences from the Transnational University Limburg, Diepenbeek, Belgium. She finished her master thesis on ‘Methods for optimal sperm selection and preservation in the IVF laboratory’ at the Genk Institute for Fertility Technology of the Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium. In September 2012, she started a PhD project ‘Sperm banking in Belgium: medical, ethical and economical aspects’, a collaboration between Hasselt University and the Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg with Willem Ombelet as promoter.
Copyright
© 2014 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.