Abstract
Keywords
Introduction
- Kupka M.S.
- D'Hooghe T.
- Ferraretti A.P.
- de Mouzon J.
- Erb K.
- Castilla J.A.
- Calhaz-Jorge C.
- De Geyter C.
- Goossens V.
Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.
- Murray E.
- Pearson R.
- Fernandes M.
- Santos I.S.
- Barros F.C.
- Victora C.G.
- Stein A.
- Matijasevich A.
- Ludwig A.
- Katalinic A.
- Thyen U.
- Sutcliffe A.G.
- Diedrich K.
- Ludwig M.
- Knoester M.
- Helmerhorst F.M.
- Vandenbroucke J.P.
- van der Westerlaken L.A.
- Walther F.J.
- Veen S.
Cognitive development of singletons born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilization and natural conception.
- La Bastide-Van Gemert S.
- Seggers J.
- Haadsma M.L.
- Heineman M.J.
- Middelburg K.J.
- Roseboom T.J.
- Schendelaar P.
- Hadders-Algra M.
- Van den Heuvel E.R.
- Seggers J.
- Haadsma M.L.
- La Bastide-Van Gemert S.
- Heineman M.J.
- Middelburg K.J.
- Roseboom T.J.
- Schendelaar P.
- Van den Heuvel E.R.
- Hadders-Algra M.
Marterials and methods
Participants

Setting
Characteristics | OS–IVF | MNC–IVF | Sub–NC | Subfertile group | Reference group |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
n = 63 | n = 53 | n = 79 | n = 195 | n = 98 | |
Child characteristics | |||||
Male gender, n (%) | 34(54.0) | 26(49.1) | 41(51.9) | 101(51.8) | 54(55.1) |
First born, n (%) | 43(68.3) | 37(69.8) | 49(62.0) | 129(66.2) | 46(46.9) |
Corrected age at examination at 4 years of age (months), median (range) | 50(47.5–60.1) | 48.9(48.0–52.5) | 48.9(47.9–56.4) | 48.9(47.5–60.1) | 49.1(48.0–54.6) |
Birth characteristics | |||||
Gestational age (weeks) e , median (range)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 39.4(33.4–42.3) | 40.1(34.6–42.6) | 40.0(30.1–42.7) | 40.0(30.1–42.7) | 40.1(32.0–42.4) |
Preterm birth (<37 weeks) e , n (%)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 7(11.1) | 6(11.3) | 5(6.3) | 18(9.2) | 3(3.1) |
Birthweight (g) e , mean (sd)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 3393.1(563.2) | 3384.4(585.7) | 3577.9(519.4)/ | 3465.6(557.2) | 3599.7(507.0) |
Low birthweight (<2500 gram) e , n (%)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 3(4.8) | 4(7.5) | 3(3.8) | 10(5.1) | 2(2.1) |
Small for gestational age, e , n (%)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 0(0) | 3(5.7) | 1(1.3) | 4(2.1) | 4(4.3) |
Signs of fetal distress, n (%) | 19(30.2) | 15(28.3) | 34(43.0) | 68(34.9) | 29(29.6) |
Neonatal characteristics | |||||
Apgar score 5 min <7 e , n (%)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 0(0) | 0(0) | 1(1.3) | 1(0.5) | 3(4.2) |
Neonatal intensive care admission, n (%) | 1(1.6) | 2(3.8) | 5(6.3) | 8(4.1) | 10(10.2) |
Parental characteristics | |||||
Maternal age at conception in years e , median (range)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 32.3(26.3–40.9) | 32.8(25.3–37.5) | 33.0(22.2–40.3) | 32.8(22.2–40.9) | 30.4(18.8–40.5) |
Paternal age at conception in years e , median (range)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 35.4(27.5–56.1) | 34.0(28.3–47.8) | 35.0(25.5–48.7) | 35(25.5–56.1) | 32.6(22.5–45.1) |
Education level mother (high), n(%) | 20(31.7) | 20(37.7) | 37(46.8) | 77(39.5) | 52(53.1) |
Education level father (high) e , n(%)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 28(46.7) | 17(32.7) | 29(36.7) | 74(38.7) | 53(56.4) |
Smoking during pregnancy, n (%) | 7(11.1) | 7(13.2) | 9(11.4) | 23(11.8) | 5(5.1) |
Alcohol consumption during pregnancy, n (%) | 3(4.8) | 0(0) | 2(2.5) | 5(2.6) | 4(4.1) |
Divorced, n (%) | 1(1.6) | 1(1.9) | 3(3.8) | 5(2.6) | 11(11.2) |
Fertility parameters | |||||
Time to pregnancy in years;, e median (range)Overall missing data: gestational age (n = 1), preterm (n = 1), birthweight (n = 4), low birthweight (n = 3) , small for gestational age (n = 1) , Apgar score 5 min <7 (n = 31), maternal age at conception (n = 1), paternal age at conception (n = 8), education level father (n = 8), time to pregnancy (n = 1). | 4.0(0.0–13.5) | 4.0(0.5–13.5) | 2.5(0.5–11.5)/ | 3.5(0.0–13.5) | 0.5(0.5–1.0) |
Type of infertility (primary), n (%) | 35(55.6) | 32(60.4) | 41(51.9) | 108(55.4) | NA |
ICSI performed; n (%) | 41(65.1) | 26(49.1) | NA | NA | NA |
Measurements
Statistical analyses
Ethical approval
Results
Participation and demographic characteristics
Effect of ovarian stimulation and in-vitro procedure
Reference mean (SE) | Mean difference [95% CI] | Reference mean (SE) | Mean difference [95% CI] | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive development | Sub–NC | MNC–IVF | OS–IVF | Fertile reference group | Subfertile group |
(n = 77) | (n = 53) | (n = 63) | (n = 97) | (n = 193) | |
Total IQ | 108.9(1.22) | −3.7 [−7.8 ; 0.5] | −2.8 [−6.8; 1.2] | 110.4(1.10) | −3.5 [−6.3; −0.7] |
Sequential IQ | 95.9(1.31) | 1.2 [−3.0; 5.4] | 0.5 [−3.5; 4.5] | 99.6(1.18) | −3.2 [−6.0; −0.3] |
Simultaneous IQ | 115.5(1.59) | −1.5 [−6.3; 3.4] | −2.4 [−7.0; 2.2] | 117.8(1.46) | −3.5 [−6.9; −0.0] |
Learning IQ | 98.3(1.26) | −2.6 [−6.7; 1.5] | −1.5 [−5.4; 2.4] | 99.6(1.02) | −2.4 [−5.2; 0.3] |
Knowledge IQ | 112.7(1.12) | −6.0 [−10.3; −1.8] | −4.4 [−8.5; −0.4] | 111.3(1.26) | −1.7 [−4.7; 1.4] |
Behavioral development | Sub–NC | MNC–IVF | OS–IVF | Fertile reference group | Subfertile group |
(n = 78) | (n = 52) | (n = 62) | (n = 96) | (n = 192) | |
CBCL total problem T-score | 47.8(1.06) | −1.6 [−4.8; 1.5] | −0.5 [−3.4; 2.4] | 44.4(0.99) | 2.2 [−0.0; 4.5] |
CBCL internalizing T-score | 48.0(1.14) | −1.3 [−4.8; 2.3] | −3.0 [−6.3; 0.4] | 45.0(1.04) | 1.8 [−0.7; 4.2] |
CBCL externalizing T-score | 48.7(1.01) | −1.2 [−4.2; 1.9] | −0.5 [−3.4; 2.4] | 46.2(0.95) | 2.0 [−0.2; 4.2] |
Presence and severity of subfertility

Discussion
- Knoester M.
- Helmerhorst F.M.
- Vandenbroucke J.P.
- van der Westerlaken L.A.
- Walther F.J.
- Veen S.
Cognitive development of singletons born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilization and natural conception.
- Ludwig A.
- Katalinic A.
- Thyen U.
- Sutcliffe A.G.
- Diedrich K.
- Ludwig M.
Acknowledgement
Appendix. Supplementary material
- Fig. S1
An example of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) representing possible hypothetical causal relationships between the variables Maternal educational level, Smoking during pregnancy, Time to pregnancy, Child IQ score and Child behavioural problems.
- Fig. S2
Assuming the true underlying mechanism to be depicted in Figure S1, Child behavioural problems too is independent of Maternal educational level, Smoking during pregnancy and Time to pregnancy when conditioned on Child IQ score. Hence, the algorithm concludes that the three corresponding edges in Figure S2A can be removed, resulting in the undirected graph in Figure S2B. As Child IQ score is conditionally independent from Maternal educational level when simultaneously conditioning on both variables Smoking during pregnancy and Time to pregnancy according to the assumingly true underlying mechanism from Figure 1, the algorithm also knows to remove the edge between Child IQ score and Maternal educational level. A similar argument leads to the removal of the edge between Smoking during pregnancy and Time to pregnancy. All other edges in the graph remain, as those dependencies between the variables cannot be eliminated by conditioning on any subset of the other variables. These steps result in the so-called undirected dependency graph (Figure S2C), a graph similar to the graph in Figure I, but without direction, represented by the arrows.
- Fig. S3
The partially directed graph of the five known variables, representing the result of the search algorithms. The open circles at the end of the edges denote the fact that there could either be an arrow or an empty space (but we could not determine which, based on the data). Definite non-colliders are denoted in the graph by the drawn bars over or under a variable and two open circle ends. The definite non-collider Maternal educational level as represented by the pattern:
Smoking during pregnancy o − o Maternal educational level o − o Time to pregnancy represents one of the three following situations:
Smoking during pregnancy o→ Maternal educational level −o Time to pregnancy
Smoking during pregnancy o − Maternal educational level ←o Time to pregnancy
Smoking during pregnancy o − Maternal educational level −o Time to pregnancy
Note that the latter is indeed the one from the assumingly true underlying mechanism as depicted in Figure S1. Similarly, all other open circle ends of the definite non-colliders could be replaced, as long as no new colliders are introduced.
- Appendix S1
Supplementary appendix.
References
- Manual for the ASEBA Preschool Forms & Profiles.University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry, USA, Burlington2000
- Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight, and Caesarean section: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort.Hum. Reprod. 2003; 18: 2478-2484
- Childhood socioeconomic status amplifies genetic effects on adult intelligence.Psychol. Sci. 2013; 24: 2111-2116
- A cross-sectional evaluation of the first cohort of young adults conceived by in vitro fertilization in the United States.Fertil. Steril. 2010; 94: 2043-2049
- Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis.JAMA. 2002; 288: 728-737
- Gene-environment correlation linking aggression and peer victimization: do classroom behavioral norms matter?.J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 2015; 43: 19-31
- Early risk factors for mental retardation: role of maternal age and maternal education.Am. J. Ment. Retard. 2002; 107: 46-59
- Effects of long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation of infant formula on cognition and behaviour at 9 years of age.Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2012; 54: 1102-1108
- School outcome, cognitive functioning, and behaviour problems in moderate and late preterm children and adults: a review.Semin. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 17: 163-169
- Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysis.Lancet. 1999; 353: 1746-1749
- The role of general cognitive ability in moderating the relation of adverse life events to emotional and behavioural problems.Br. J. Psychol. 2013; 104: 130-139
- Cognitive development of singletons conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection or in vitro fertilization at age 5 and 10 years.J. Pediatr. Psychol. 2009; 34: 774-781
- Ovarian stimulation for IVF has no quantitative association with birthweight: a registry study.Hum. Reprod. 2008; 23: 2549-2554
- General movements in early infancy predict neuromotor development at 9 to 12 years of age.Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2005; 47: 731-738
- Language assessment of non-handicapped twins at 5 years of age.Pediatr. Int. 2011; 53: 944-949
- Two distinct forms of minor neurological dysfunction: perspectives emerging from a review of data of the Groningen Perinatal Project.Dev. Med. Child Neurol. 2002; 44: 561-571
- Minor neurological dysfunction is more closely related to learning difficulties than to behavioral problems.J. Learn. Disabil. 1992; 25: 649-657
- Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women conceiving without assisted reproductive technologies.Fertil. Steril. 2010; 94: 2674-2679
- The risks associated with pregnancy in women aged 35 years or older.Hum. Reprod. 2000; 15: 2433-2437
- The Groningen assisted reproductive technologies cohort study: developmental status and behavior at 2 years.Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95: 2283-2289
- Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children.second ed. AGS Publishing, Circle Pines, USA2004
- Matched follow-up study of 5–8 year old ICSI-singletons: comparison of their neuromotor development to IVF and naturally conceived singletons.Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22: 1638-1646
- Cognitive development of singletons born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with in vitro fertilization and natural conception.Fertil. Steril. 2008; 90: 289-296
- Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2011: results generated from European registers by ESHRE.Hum. Reprod. 2016; 31: 233-248
- Is ovarian hyperstimulation associated with higher blood pressure in 4-year-old IVF offspring? Part II: an explorative causal inference approach.Hum. Reprod. 2014; 29: 510-517
- Children conceived using ICSI do not have an increased risk of delayed mental development at 5 years of age.Hum. Reprod. 2003; 18: 2067-2072
- Cognitive and motor development of 8-year-old children born after ICSI compared to spontaneously conceived children.Hum. Reprod. 2006; 21: 2922-2929
- Follow-up of cognitive and motor development of 10-year-old singleton children born after ICSI compared with spontaneously conceived children.Hum. Reprod. 2008; 23: 105-111
- Neuromotor development and mental health at 5.5 years of age of singletons born at term after intracytoplasmatic sperm injection ICSI: results of a prospective controlled single-blinded study in Germany.Fertil. Steril. 2009; 91: 125-132
- Achievement test performance in children conceived by IVF.Hum. Reprod. 2010; 25: 2605-2611
- Neuromotor, cognitive, language and behavioural outcome in children born following IVF or ICSI-a systematic review.Hum. Reprod. Update. 2008; 14: 219-231
- The Groningen ART cohort study: ovarian hyperstimulation and the in vitro procedure do not affect neurological outcome in infancy.Hum. Reprod. 2009; 24: 3119-3126
- Ovarian hyperstimulation and the in vitro fertilization procedure do not influence early neuromotor development; a history of subfertility does.Fertil. Steril. 2010; 93: 544-553
- Are fetal growth impairment and preterm birth causally related to child attention problems and ADHD? Evidence from a comparison between high-income and middle-income cohorts.J. Epidemiol. Community Health. 2016; 70: 704-719
- The increased risk of complication observed in singleton pregnancies resulting from in-vitro fertilization (IVF) does not seem to be related to the IVF method itself.Hum. Reprod. 1993; 8: 1297-1300
- Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnanciesresulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Hum. Reprod. Update. 2012; 18: 485-503
- Cumulative pregnancy rates after a maximum of nine cycles of modified natural cycle IVF and analysis of patient drop-out: a cohort study.Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22: 2463-2470
- Cumulative pregnancy rates after sequential treatment with modified natural cycle IVF followed by IVF with controlled ovarian stimulation.Hum. Reprod. 2008; 23: 1808-1814
- R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria2012
- Comparison of the pregnancy outcomes of subfertile women after infertility treatment and in naturally conceived pregnancies.Hum. Reprod. 2012; 27: 1162-1169
- A significant linear association exists between advanced maternal age and adverse perinatal outcome.Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2010; 283: 755-759
- The Groningen ART cohort study: the effects of ovarian hyperstimulation and the IVF laboratory procedures on neurological condition at 2 years.Hum. Reprod. 2011; 26: 703-712
- Movement variation in infants born following IVF/ICSI with and without ovarian hyperstimulation.Early Hum. Dev. 2013; 89: 507-513
- Increased time to pregnancy is associated with less optimal neurological condition in 4-year-old singletons, in vitro fertilization itself is not.Hum. Reprod. 2014; 29: 2773-2786
- Increased time to pregnancy is associated with suboptimal neurological condition of 2-year-olds.Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013; 98: F434-F436
- Is ovarian hyperstimulation associated with higher blood pressure in 4-year-old IVF offspring? Part I: multivariable regression analysis.Hum. Reprod. 2014; 29: 502-509
- Outcome of assisted reproduction.Lancet. 2007; 370: 351-359
- Causal Models and Statistical Data.(Pittsburgh)2010
- Ocular malformations or poor visual acuity in children born after in vitro fertilization in Sweden.Am. J. Ophthalmol. 2010; 150: 23-26
- Handleiding voor de CBCL/4–18.Sophia Kinderziekenhuis, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands2000
- Behavior and socioemotional functioning in 9–18-year-old children born after in vitro fertilization.Fertil. Steril. 2009; 92: 1907-1914
- Information processing, attention and visual-motor function of adolescents born after in vitro fertilization compared with spontaneous conception.Hum. Reprod. 2009; 24: 913-921
- Examining infertility treatment and early childhood development in the upstate KIDS study.JAMA Pediatr. 2016; 4: 1-9
- Infertility, infertility treatment and psychomotor development: the Danish National Birth Cohort.Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2009; 23: 98-106
- Infertility, infertility treatment and behavioural problems in the offspring.Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 2011; 25: 466-477
Biography
