Advertisement
Article| Volume 39, ISSUE 1, P155-160, July 2019

Download started.

Ok

Early versus delayed follow-up after misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss

Published:March 11, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.02.011

      Abstract

      Research question

      Does extending the follow-up after misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss increase the success rate?

      Design

      Patients who had experienced early pregnancy loss (<12 weeks) and were treated with misoprostol in a single university-affiliated medical centre were prospectively followed before and after the implementation of a new treatment protocol extending the follow-up from 1 to 2 weeks. All patients received misoprostol 800 μg vaginally on day 1 and a second dose, when needed, on day 4 or 8. Patients underwent surgical aspiration after 1 week in the early follow-up group (n = 84) or 2 weeks in the delayed follow-up group (n = 85) if complete expulsion was not achieved (defined as endometrial thickness ≤15 mm and absence of gestational sac on transvaginal sonography). The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as no need for surgical aspiration.

      Results

      Women in the delayed follow-up group had a higher rate of successful treatment compared with women in the early follow-up group (88.2% versus 76.2%, respectively; P = 0.040), and a lower rate of second dose administration (32.9% versus 51.2%, respectively; P = 0.016). The incidence of non-expulsion of the gestational sac was also lower in the delayed follow-up group (1.2% versus 10.7%; P = 0.009). Treatment acceptability did not differ between the study groups.

      Conclusion

      In women with early pregnancy loss treated with misoprostol, extending the follow-up protocol from 1 to 2 weeks resulted in an increase in treatment success.

      KEYWORDS

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Reproductive BioMedicine Online
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Anon
        Acog committee opinion no. 427: Misoprostol for postabortion care.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 465-468
        • Anon
        Practice bulletin no. 200: Early pregnancy loss.
        Obstetrics and gynecology. 2018;
        • Ashok P.W.
        • Penney G.C.
        • Flett G.M.
        • Templeton A.
        An effective regimen for early medical abortion: A report of 2000 consecutive cases.
        Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 1998; 13: 2962-2965
        • Autry A.
        • Jacobson G.
        • Sandhu R.
        • Isbill K.
        Medical management of non-viable early first trimester pregnancy.
        International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics. 1999; 67: 9-13
        • Barcelo F.
        • De Paco C.
        • Lopez-Espin J.J.
        • Silva Y.
        • Abad L.
        • Parrilla J.J.
        The management of missed miscarriage in an outpatient setting: 800 versus 600 mug of vaginal misoprostol.
        The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology. 2012; 52: 39-43
        • Colleselli V.
        • Nell T.
        • Bartosik T.
        • Brunner C.
        • Ciresa-Koenig A.
        • Wildt L.
        • Marth C.
        • Seeber B.
        Marked improvement in the success rate of medical management of early pregnancy failure following the implementation of a novel institutional protocol and treatment guidelines: A follow-up study.
        Archives of gynecology and obstetrics. 2016; 294: 1265-1272
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Harwood B.
        • Guido R.S.
        • Fox M.C.
        • Zhang J.
        Endometrial thickness after misoprostol use for early pregnancy failure.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004; 86: 22-26
        • Doubilet P.M.
        • Benson C.B.
        • Bourne T.
        • Blaivas M.
        • Barnhart K.T.
        • Benacerraf B.R.
        • Brown D.L.
        • Filly R.A.
        • Fox J.C.
        • Goldstein S.R.
        • Kendall J.L.
        • Lyons E.A.
        • Porter M.B.
        • Pretorius D.H.
        • Timor-Tritsch I.E.
        Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester.
        The New England journal of medicine. 2013; 369: 1443-1451
        • Mizrachi Y.
        • Dekalo A.
        • Gluck O.
        • Miremberg H.
        • Dafna L.
        • Feldstein O.
        • Weiner E.
        • Bar J.
        • Sagiv R.
        Single versus repeat doses of misoprostol for treatment of early pregnancy loss-a randomized clinical trial.
        Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 2017; 32: 1202-1207
        • Neilson J.P.
        • Hickey M.
        • Vazquez J.
        Medical treatment for early fetal death (less than 24 weeks).
        The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2006; (Cd002253)
        • Ngai S.W.
        • Chan Y.M.
        • Tang O.S.
        • Ho P.C.
        Vaginal misoprostol as medical treatment for first trimester spontaneous miscarriage.
        Human reproduction (Oxford, England). 2001; 16: 1493-1496
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Kudva A.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Medical abortion outcomes after a second dose of misoprostol for persistent gestational sac.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 332-335
        • Schreiber C.A.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Atrio J.
        • Sonalkar S.
        • Ratcliffe S.J.
        • Barnhart K.T.
        Mifepristone pretreatment for the medical management of early pregnancy loss.
        The New England journal of medicine. 2018; 378: 2161-2170
        • Spitz I.M.
        • Bardin C.W.
        • Benton L.
        • Robbins A.
        Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the united states.
        The New England journal of medicine. 1998; 338: 1241-1247
        • Van Den Berg J.
        • Gordon B.B.
        • Snijders M.P.
        • Vandenbussche F.P.
        • Coppus S.F.
        The added value of mifepristone to non-surgical treatment regimens for uterine evacuation in case of early pregnancy failure: A systematic review of the literature.
        European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology. 2015; 195: 18-26
        • Wang X.
        • Chen C.
        • Wang L.
        • Chen D.
        • Guang W.
        • French J.
        Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: A population-based prospective study.
        Fertility and sterility. 2003; 79: 577-584
        • Weeks A.
        • Alia G.
        Ultrasonography may have role in assessing spontaneous miscarriage.
        Bmj. 2001; 323: 694
        • Wilcox A.J.
        • Weinberg C.R.
        • O'connor J.F.
        • Baird D.D.
        • Schlatterer J.P.
        • Canfield R.E.
        • Armstrong E.G.
        • Nisula B.C.
        Incidence of early loss of pregnancy.
        N Engl J Med. 1988; 319: 189-194
        • Wu H.L.
        • Marwah S.
        • Wang P.
        • Wang Q.M.
        • Chen X.W.
        Misoprostol for medical treatment of missed abortion: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
        Scientific reports. 2017; 7: 1664
        • Zinaman M.J.
        • Clegg E.D.
        • Brown C.C.
        • O'connor J.
        • Selevan S.G.
        Estimates of human fertility and pregnancy loss.
        Fertility and sterility. 1996; 65: 503-509

      Biography

      Yossi Mizrachi is a resident in obstetrics and gynaecology at the Edith Wolfson Medical Center, affiliated with Tel-Aviv University, Israel. His main research interests are reproductive medicine and early pregnancy loss.
      Key message
      Extending the follow-up protocol after misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy loss from 1 to 2 weeks resulted in higher success rates and reduced the need to administer a second dose. Patients and clinicians can be reassured that a delay in follow-up maximizes the chance of complete expulsion.