Advertisement

Key recommendations for high-quality female oncofertility care based on international clinical practice guidelines

Published:December 04, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.11.016

      Abstract

      Research question

      Which guideline-based key recommendations can be selected for high-quality female oncofertility care?

      Design

      The Delphi method was used to select a set of key recommendations for female oncofertility care. First, recommendations from (inter)national clinical practice guidelines were selected in four domains: risk communication, referral, counselling and decision-making. Thereafter, they were scored, per domain, on their importance for high-quality oncofertility care by a multidisciplinary, oncofertility expert panel, consisting of patients, referrers and counsellors, in two Delphi rounds. Finally, the selected key recommendations were presented for approval in a third round. Differences in perspectives between subgroups of the expert panel were analysed.

      Results

      A panel of 86 experts was asked to select key recommendations for high-quality oncofertility care. Eleven key recommendations were selected. Key recommendations in the domains risk communication and referral focused on information provision and offering referral to a reproductive specialist to female cancer patients. With the counselling domain, key recommendations focused on all aspects of counselling, including different methods, safety, pros and cons. In the decision-making domain, key recommendations focused on shared decision-making and supporting the decision with written information. The final set of key recommendations was approved by 91% of the experts. Differences in perspectives were found between subgroups. Patients found recommendations on decision-making and information provision more important.

      Conclusion

      A set of 11 key recommendations for high-quality female oncofertility care was selected by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The involvement of the perspectives of patients, referrers and counsellors led to this valid, acceptable and credible set of key recommendations.

      KEYWORDS

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Reproductive BioMedicine Online
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Aben K.K.
        • van Gaal C.
        • van Gils N.A.
        • van der Graaf W.T.
        • Zielhuis G.A.
        Cancer in adolescents and young adults (15-29 years): a population-based study in the Netherlands 1989-2009.
        Acta Oncol. 2012; 51: 922-933
        • Anazodo A.
        • Laws P.
        • Logan S.
        • Saunders C.
        • Travaglia J.
        • Gerstl B.
        • Bradford N.
        • Cohn R.
        • Birdsall M.
        • Barr R.
        • Suzuki N.
        • Takae S.
        • Marinho R.
        • Xiao S.
        • Qiong-Hua C.
        • Mahajan N.
        • Patil M.
        • Gunasheela D.
        • Smith K.
        • Sender L.
        • Melo C.
        • Almeida-Santos T.
        • Salama M.
        • Appiah L.
        • Su I.
        • Lane S.
        • Woodruff T.K.
        • Pacey A.
        • Anderson R.A.
        • Shenfield F.
        • Ledger W.
        • Sullivan E.
        How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2019; 25: 159-179
        • Anazodo A.
        • Laws P.
        • Logan S.
        • Saunders C.
        • Travaglia J.
        • Gerstl B.
        • Bradford N.
        • Cohn R.
        • Birdsall M.
        • Barr R.
        • Suzuki N.
        • Takae S.
        • Marinho R.
        • Xiao S.
        • Qiong-Hua C.
        • Mahajan N.
        • Patil M.
        • Gunasheela D.
        • Smith K.
        • Sender L.
        • Melo C.
        • Almeida-Santos T.
        • Salama M.
        • Appiah L.
        • Su I.
        • Lane S.
        • Woodruff T.K.
        • Pacey A.
        • Anderson R.A.
        • Shenfield F.
        • Ledger W.
        • Sullivan E.
        The Development of an International Oncofertility Competency Framework: A Model to Increase Oncofertility Implementation.
        Oncologist. 2019; 24: 1-10
        • Bastings L.
        • Baysal O.
        • Beerendonk C.C.
        • IntHout J.
        • Traas M.A.
        • Verhaak C.M.
        • Braat D.D.
        • Nelen W.L.
        Deciding about fertility preservation after specialist counselling.
        Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 1721-1729
        • Bastings L.
        • Baysal O.
        • Beerendonk C.C.
        • Braat D.D.
        • Nelen W.L.
        Referral for fertility preservation counselling in female cancer patients.
        Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 2228-2237
        • Baysal O.
        • Bastings L.
        • Beerendonk C.C.
        • Postma S.A.
        • IntHout J.
        • Verhaak C.M.
        • Braat D.D.
        • Nelen W.L.
        Decision-making in female fertility preservation is balancing the expected burden of fertility preservation treatment and the wish to conceive.
        Hum Reprod. 2015; 30: 1625-1634
        • Baysal O.
        • Hamilton J.A.M.
        • Hamilton C.
        • Braat D.D.M.
        • Beerendonk C.C.M.
        • Nelen W.
        Clinical practice guidelines for fertility preservation in young women undergoing gonadotoxic treatment: an overview and critical appraisal of methodological quality and content.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2018; 37: 60-70
        • Boulkedid R.
        • Abdoul H.
        • Loustau M.
        • Sibony O.
        • Alberti C.
        Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review.
        PLoS One. 2011; 6: e20476
        • Bradford N.K.
        • Walker R.
        • Henney R.
        • Inglis P.
        • Chan R.J.
        Improvements in Clinical Practice for Fertility Preservation Among Young Cancer Patients: Results from Bundled Interventions.
        J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2018; 7: 37-45
        • Brouwers M.C.
        • Kho M.E.
        • Browman G.P.
        • Burgers J.S.
        • Cluzeau F
        • Feder G.
        • Fervers B.
        • Graham I.D.
        • Grimshaw J.
        • Hanna S.E.
        • Littlejohns P.
        • Makarski J.
        • Zitzelsberger L.
        • AGREE Next Steps Consortium
        AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.
        CMAJ. 2010; 182: E839-E842
        • Brusamolino E.
        • Bacigalupo A.
        • Barosi G.
        • Biti G.
        • Gobbi P.G.
        • Levis A.
        • Marchetti M.
        • Santoro A.
        • Zinzani P.L.
        • Tura S.
        Classical Hodgkin's lymphoma in adults: guidelines of the Italian Society of Hematology, the Italian Society of Experimental Hematology, and the Italian Group for Bone Marrow Transplantation on initial work-up, management, and follow-up.
        Haematologica. 2009; 94: 550-565
        • Campbell S.M.
        • Braspenning J.
        • Hutchinson A.
        • Marshall M.N.
        Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.
        Bmj. 2003; 326: 816-819
        • Campbell S.M.
        • Cantrill J.A.
        • Roberts D.
        Prescribing indicators for UK general practice: Delphi consultation study.
        Bmj. 2000; 321: 425-428
      1. Davies, M. C., and Jonges, A.L., on behalf of the Guidelines Committee of the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. 2011. Pregnancy and Breast Cancer: Green-top guideline no. 12. Retrieved 19-08, 2019, fromhttps://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/gtg_12.pdf.

        • De Angelis R.
        • Sant M.
        • Coleman M.P.
        • Francisci S.
        • Baili P.
        • Pierannunzio D.
        • Trama A.
        • Visser O.
        • Brenner H.
        • Ardanaz E.
        • Bielska-Lasota M.
        • Engholm G.
        • Nennecke A.
        • Siesling S.
        • Berrino F.
        • Capocaccia R.
        Cancer survival in Europe 1999-2007 by country and age: results of EUROCARE–5-a population-based study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: 23-34
        • Breejen den
        • M. E.
        • Nelen W.L.
        • Schol S.F.
        • Kremer J.A.
        • Hermens R.P.
        Development of guideline-based indicators for patient-centredness in fertility care: what patients add.
        Hum Reprod. 2013; 28: 987-996
        • Deshpande N.A.
        • Braun I.M.
        • Meyer F.L.
        Impact of fertility preservation counseling and treatment on psychological outcomes among women with cancer: A systematic review.
        Cancer. 2015; 121: 3938-3947
        • Dolmans M.M.
        • Lambertini M.
        • Macklon K.T.
        • Almeida Santos T.
        • Ruiz-Casado A.
        • Borini A.
        • Bordes V.
        • Frith L.
        • Van Moer E.
        • Germeyer A.
        EUropean REcommendations for female FERtility preservation (EU-REFER): A joint collaboration between oncologists and fertility specialists.
        Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019; 138: 233-240
      2. Fitch K., B. S., Aguilar MD, Burnand B., LaCalle J.R. (2001). The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method user's manual. DTIC Document.

        • Grol R.
        • Grimshaw J.
        From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care.
        Lancet. 2003; 362: 1225-1230
        • Hermens R.P.
        • Ouwens M.M.
        • Vonk-Okhuijsen S.Y.
        • van der Wel Y.
        • Tjan-Heijnen V.C.
        • van den Broek L.D.
        • Ho V.K.
        • Janssen-Heijnen M.L.
        • Groen H.J.
        • Grol R.P.
        • Wollersheim H.C.
        Development of quality indicators for diagnosis and treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a first step toward implementing a multidisciplinary, evidence-based guideline.
        Lung Cancer. 2006; 54: 117-124
        • Kotter T.
        • Schaefer F.A.
        • Scherer M.
        • Blozik E.
        Involving patients in quality indicator development - a systematic review.
        Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013; 7: 259-268
        • Letourneau J.M.
        • Ebbel E.E.
        • Katz P.P.
        • Katz A.
        • Ai W.Z.
        • Chien A.J.
        • Melisko M.E.
        • Cedars M.I.
        • Rosen M.P.
        Pretreatment fertility counseling and fertility preservation improve quality of life in reproductive age women with cancer.
        Cancer. 2012; 118: 1710-1717
        • Lewin J.
        • Ma J.M.Z.
        • Mitchell L.
        • Tam S.
        • Puri N.
        • Stephens D.
        • Srikanthan A.
        • Bedard P.
        • Razak A.
        • Crump M.
        • Warr D.
        • Giuliani M.
        • Gupta A.
        The positive effect of a dedicated adolescent and young adult fertility program on the rates of documentation of therapy-associated infertility risk and fertility preservation options.
        Support Care Cancer. 2017; 25: 1915-1922
        • Logan S.
        • Perz J.
        • Ussher J.
        • Peate M.
        • Anazodo A.
        Clinician provision of oncofertility support in cancer patients of a reproductive age: A systematic review.
        Psychooncology. 2018; 27: 748-756
        • Logan S.
        • Perz J.
        • Ussher J.M.
        • Peate M.
        • Anazodo A.
        A systematic review of patient oncofertility support needs in reproductive cancer patients aged 14 to 45 years of age.
        Psychooncology. 2018; 27: 401-409
        • Loren A.W.
        • Mangu P.B.
        • Beck L.N.
        • Brennan L.
        • Magdalinski A.J.
        • Partridge A.H.
        • Quinn G.
        • Wallace W.H.
        • Oktay K.
        Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update.
        J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31: 2500-2510
        • Niemasik E.E.
        • Letourneau J.
        • Dohan D.
        • Katz A.
        • Melisko M.
        • Rugo H.
        • Rosen M.
        Patient perceptions of reproductive health counseling at the time of cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of female California cancer survivors.
        J Cancer Surviv. 2012; 6: 324-332
      3. NVOG. 2016. Fertility Preservation for women with cancer. Retrieved 19-08, 2019, fromhttps://www.oncoline.nl/fertiliteitsbehoud-bij-vrouwen-met-kanker.

        • Oktay K.
        • Harvey B.E.
        • Partridge A.H.
        • Quinn G.P.
        • Reinecke J.
        • Taylor H.S.
        • Wallace W.H.
        • Wang E.T.
        • Loren A.W.
        Fertility Preservation in Patients With Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline Update.
        J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36: 1994-2001
        • Quinn G.P.
        • Block R.G.
        • Clayman M.L.
        • Kelvin J.
        • Arvey S.R.
        • Lee J.H.
        • Reinecke J.
        • Sehovic I.
        • Jacobsen P.B.
        • Reed D.
        • Gonzalez L.
        • Vadaparampil S.T.
        • Laronga C.
        • Lee M.C.
        • Pow-Sang J.
        • Eggly S.
        • Franklin A.
        • Shah B.
        • Fulp W.J.
        • Hayes-Lattin B.
        If you did not document it, it did not happen: rates of documentation of discussion of infertility risk in adolescent and young adult oncology patients' medical records.
        J Oncol Pract. 2015; 11: 137-144
        • Quinn G.P.
        • Vadaparampil S.T.
        • Gwede C.K.
        • Miree C.
        • King L.M.
        • Clayton H.B.
        • Wilson C.
        • Munster P.
        Discussion of fertility preservation with newly diagnosed patients: oncologists' views.
        J Cancer Surviv. 2007; 1: 146-155
        • Schleedoorn M.J.
        • Nelen W.L.
        • Dunselman G.A.
        • Vermeulen N.
        Selection of key recommendations for the management of women with endometriosis by an international panel of patients and professionals.
        Hum Reprod. 2016; 31: 1208-1218
        • Shimizu C.
        • Bando H.
        • Kato T.
        • Mizota Y.
        • Yamamoto S.
        • Fujiwara Y.
        Physicians' knowledge, attitude, and behavior regarding fertility issues for young breast cancer patients: a national survey for breast care specialists.
        Breast Cancer. 2013; 20: 230-240
        • Skaczkowski G.
        • White V.
        • Thompson K.
        • Bibby H.
        • Coory M.
        • Orme L.M.
        • Conyers R.
        • Phillips M.B.
        • Osborn M.
        • Harrup R.
        • Anazodo A.
        Factors influencing the provision of fertility counseling and impact on quality of life in adolescents and young adults with cancer.
        J Psychosoc Oncol. 2018; 36: 484-502
      4. Stern, K., Bardy, P., Bourne, K., Downie, P., Hart, R., Hickey, M., Lewis, K., McLachlan, R., Myles, G., Panek-Hudson, Y., Phillips, M.B., Seymour, J.F., Smith, H., Thompson, A., on behalf of the Clinical Oncology Society of Australia. 2014. Fertility preservation for AYAs diagnosed with cancer: Guidance for health professionals. Retrieved 19-08, 2019, fromhttps://wiki.cancer.org.au/australia/COSA:AYA_cancer_fertility_preservation.

      5. Treasure, T., Bewley, S., Bhattacharya, S., Brian, K., Child, T., Davies, M., Harbottle, S., Kendrew, H., Leiws-Jones, C., Searle, C., Taylor, P., on behalf of the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence and Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (UK). 2013. Fertility: Assessment and Treatment for People with Fertility Problems. Retrieved 19-08, 2019, fromhttps://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg156/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-188539453

        • Tschudin S.
        • Bitzer J.
        Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2009; 15: 587-597
        • Uphoff E.P.
        • Wennekes L.
        • Punt C.J.
        • Grol R.P.
        • Wollersheim H.C.
        • Hermens R.P.
        • Ottevanger P.B.
        Development of generic quality indicators for patient-centered cancer care by using a RAND modified Delphi method.
        Cancer Nurs. 2012; 35: 29-37
        • Vu J.V.
        • Llarena N.C.
        • Estevez S.L.
        • Moravek M.B.
        • Jeruss J.S.
        Oncofertility program implementation increases access to fertility preservation options and assisted reproductive procedures for breast cancer patients.
        J Surg Oncol. 2017; 115: 116-121
      6. Wallace, W. H., Anderson, R., Brown, J., Buck, S., Burns, J., Cowie, F., Craigie, I., Edgar, A., Elmantaser, M., Gibson, B., Heaney, N., Layden, J., McManus, C., Murphy, J., Nguyen, D., Rogers, S., Shaikh, G., Stein, A., Thompson, L., on behalf of the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. 2013. Long term follow up of survivors of childhood cancer. Retrieved 19-08, 2019, fromhttps://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign132.pdf

      Biography

      Özlem Baysal received her medical degree in 2013 after graduating from the Radboud University in Nijmegen, the Netherlands. She started her PhD programme in the same year at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Radboud University Medical Center on the topic of fertility preservation care in adult women.
      Key message
      Eleven key recommendations were selected for high-quality female oncofertility care by a multidisciplinary oncofertility expert panel. This set of key recommendations is the first step towards establishing a measuring tool for identifying problems, improving the quality of female oncofertility care and eventually improving the quality of life of survivors internationally.