Advertisement

Guideline-based quality indicators for early pregnancy assessment units

Published:December 06, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.12.003

      Abstract

      Research question

      What valid guideline-based quality indicators can measure quality of care in early pregnancy assessment units (EPAU)?

      Design

      The systematic RAND-modified Delphi method was used to develop an indicator set from four evidence-based guidelines. An international expert panel was assembled to extract recommendations from these guidelines to establish quality indicators.

      Results

      A total of 119 recommendations were extracted. Eleven recommendations received a high median score and top five score above the 75th percentile and were selected as key recommendations. The expert panel reassessed 15 high score recommendations and top five score between the 50th and 75th percentile as well as one high score recommendation without consensus. Eight of these 16 recommendations were selected in the second round as key recommendations. The key recommendations were formulated into a set of 19 quality indicators, summarized as follows: women referred to an EPAU could be seen within 24 h and receive a clear explanation on treatment options; designated senior staff members could be responsible for the unit and staff could have had ultrasound training; protocols could be available for daily practice covering all treatment options for miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy; and an EPAU could have access to urine pregnancy testing and serum HCG assays.

      Conclusions

      Nineteen quality indicators to measure early pregnancy care provided by EPAU were identified.

      KEYWORDS

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Reproductive BioMedicine Online
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Association of Early Pregnancy Units. Guidelines, 2007.http://www.earlypregnancy.org.uk/index.asp

      2. Association of Early Pregnancy Units, 2019. Website:www.aepu.org.uk

        • Campbell S.M.
        • Cantrill J.A.
        • Roberts D.
        Prescribing indicators for UK general practice.
        Delphi consultation study. BMJ. 2000; 321: 425-428
        • Campbell S.M.
        • Braspenning J.
        • Hutchinson A.
        • Marshall M.N.
        Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care.
        BMJ. 2003; 12: 816-819
      3. Dalkey, N., Brown, B., Cochran, S., 1969. The Delphi method III: use of self ratings to improve group estimates. Available from:http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_memoranda/2006/RM6115.pdf.

        • Den Breejen E.M.E.
        • Hermens R.P.M.G.
        • Galama W.H.
        • Willemsen W.N.P.
        • Kremer J.A.M.
        • Nelen W.L.D.M.
        Added value of involving patients in the first step of multidisciplinary guideline development: a qualitative interview study among infertile patients.
        Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2016; 28: 299-305
      4. Fitch, K., Bernstein, S., Aguilar, M., 2001. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. Available from:http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1269/.

        • Goddijn M.
        • de Jager F.
        • Kaaijk E.M.
        • van der Veen F.
        • Ankum W.M.
        • Hajenius P.J.
        Problems in early pregnancy require special care: 'early pregnancy units.
        Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 2009; 153: A601
        • Grol R.
        • Baker R.
        • Moss F.
        Quality improvement research: understanding the science of change in health care.
        Qual. Saf. Health Care. 2002; 11: 110-111
      5. Hajenius, P.J., Mol, F., Mol, B.W., Bossuyt, P.M., Ankum, W.M., van der Veen, F., 2007. Interventions for tubal ectopic pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. CD000324.

        • Hermens R.P.
        • Ouwens M.M.
        • Vonk –
        • Okhuijsen S.Y.
        • van der Wel Y.
        • Tjan-Heijnen V.C.
        • van den Broek L.D.
        • Ho V.K.
        • Janssen-Heijnen M.L.
        • Groen H.J.
        • Grol R.P.
        • Wollersheim H.C.
        Development of quality indicators for diagnosis ans treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a first step toward implementing a multidisciplinary, evidence-based guideline.
        Lung cancer. 2006; 54: 117-124
        • McGory M.L.
        • Shekelle P.G.
        • Rubenstein L.Z.
        • Fink A.
        • Ko C.Y.
        Developing quality indicators for eldery patients undergoing abdominal operations.
        J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2005; 201: 870-883
        • Mol F.
        • van den Boogaard E.
        • van Mello N.M.
        • van der Veen F.
        • Mol B.W.
        • Ankum W.M.
        • van Zonneveld P.
        • Dijkman A.B.
        • Verhoeve H.R.
        • Mozes A.
        • Goddijn M.
        • Hajenius P.J.
        Guideline adherence in ectopic pregnancy management.
        Hum. Repr. 2011; 26: 307-315
      6. Ministry of Health, NSW. Maternity – Management of Early Pregnancy Complications, 2012.http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/policies.

      7. NHS National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, 2012. NICE Clinical Guideline: Ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage: Diagnosis and initial management in early pregnancy of ectopic pregnancy and miscarriage.

        • Poddar A.
        • Tyagi J.
        • Hawkins E.
        • Opemuyi I.
        Standards of care provided by early pregnancy assessment units (EPAU): a UK-wide survey.
        J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2011; 31: 640-644
        • Rai R.
        • Regan L.
        Recurrent miscarriage.
        Lancet. 2006; 368: 601-611
      8. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Standards for gynaecology 2008.http://www.rcog.org.uk/files/rcog-corp/uploaded-files/WPRGynStandards2008.pdf

        • Van den Berg M.M.J.
        • Goddijn M.
        • Ankum W.M.
        • van Woerden E.E.
        • van der Veen F.
        • van Wely M.
        • Hajenius P.J.
        Early pregnancy care over time: should we promote an early pregnancy assessment unit?.
        Repr. Biom. Onl. 2015; 31: 192-198
        • Van den Boogaard E.
        • Goddijn M.
        • Leschot N.J.
        • van der Veen F.
        • Kremer J.A.M.
        • Hermens R.P.M.G.
        Development of guideline-based quality indicators for recurrent miscarriage.
        Repr. Biom. Onl. 2010; 20: 267-271
      9. Vermeulen, N., Le Clef, N., D'Angelo, A., Veleva, Z., Tilleman, K., 2018. Manual for development of recommendations for good practice. ESHRE website.

        • Wahba K.
        • Shah A.
        • Hill K.
        • Hosni M.M.
        A Novel early pregnancy assessment unit/Gynaecology assessment unit dashboard An experience from a UK district general hospital.
        J. Obstet, Gynaecol. 2015; 35: 703-706

      Biography

      Merel van den Berg is a PhD candidate at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, the Netherlands.
      Key message
      A set of 19 quality indicators could be developed to measure and reduce practice variation in early pregnancy care provided by Early Pregnancy Assessment Units.