Do IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles using fresh and frozen ejaculated spermatozoa result in similar pregnancy outcomes in couples with non-male factor infertility?
Retrospective cohort study; patients undergoing donor egg recipient cycles, in which oocytes from a single ovarian stimulation were split between two recipients, were reviewed. Two recipients of oocytes from a single donor were paired and categorized based on the type of ejaculated spermatozoa (fresh/frozen). Outcomes included delivery rate, implantation, pregnancy, pregnancy loss and fertilization rates.
Of the 408 patients who received oocytes from a split donor oocyte cycle, 45 pairs of patients used discrepant types of ejaculated spermatozoa and were included in the study. Fertilization rate: fresh (74.8%); frozen (68.6%) (P = 0.13). Pregnancy rate: fresh (76%); frozen (67%); delivery rate: fresh (69%); frozen (44%); implantation rate was significantly higher: fresh (64%); frozen (36%) (P = 0.04). Rate of pregnancy loss was significantly higher in the frozen group compared with the fresh group (33% versus 5.9%, P = 0.013). Adjusted odds for delivery was 67% lower in the frozen group (95% CI 0.12, 0.89). Adjusted odds of pregnancy (adjusted OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.20, 2.27) and implantation (adjusted OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.12, 2.12) were not significantly different between the frozen and fresh sperm groups.
In this model that controls for oocyte quality by using paired recipients from the same donor, frozen ejaculated spermatozoa resulted in lower delivery rates than those using fresh spermatozoa
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Reproductive BioMedicine Online
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Fertilization and Pregnancy Rates after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Using Ejaculate Semen and Surgically Retrieved Sperm.Fertility and Sterility. 1997; 68: 108-111https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(97)81484-7
- Fertilization and Pregnancy Outcome after Intracytoplasmic Injection with Fresh or Cryopreserved Ejaculated Spermatozoa.Fertility and Sterility. 2007; 87: 316-320https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.032
- A Comparison of ICSI Outcomes with Fresh and Cryopreserved Epididymal Spermatozoa from the Same Couples.Human Reproduction. 2001; 16: 495-499https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.3.495
- Production of Reactive Oxygen Species by Spermatozoa Undergoing Cooling, Freezing, and Thawing.Molecular Reproduction and Development. 2001; 59: 451-458https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1052
- Cryopreservation of Human Semen and Prepared Sperm: Effects on Motility Parameters and DNA Integrity.Fertility and Sterility. 2001; 76: 892-900https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02834-5
- Assessment of DNA Integrity and Morphology of Ejaculated Spermatozoa from Fertile and Infertile Men before and after Cryopreservation.Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2001; 16: 1191-1199https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.6.1191
- Should ICSI Be Implemented during IVF to All Advanced-Age Patients with Non-Male Factor Subfertility?.Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. 2019; 17: 30https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-019-0474-y
- Assisted Reproductive Techniques.Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.). 2014; 1154: 171-231https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0659-8_8
- Morphologic Grading of Euploid Blastocysts Influences Implantation and Ongoing Pregnancy Rates.Fertility and Sterility. 2017; 107: 664-670https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.11.012
- Analysis of the Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Using Fresh or Frozen Sperm.BJU International. 2011; 107: 1124-1128https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09545.x
- The Outcome of Intracytoplasmic Injection of Fresh and Cryopreserved Ejaculated Spermatozoa—a Prospective Randomized Study.Human Reproduction. 2001; 16: 2109-2113https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/16.10.2109
- Sperm Selection during ICSI Treatments Reduces Single- but Not Double-Strand DNA Break Values Compared to the Semen Sample.Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2021; 38: 1187-1196https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02129-w
- Replacing Single Frozen-Thawed Euploid Embryos in a Natural Cycle in Ovulatory Women May Increase Live Birth Rates Compared to Medicated Cycles in Anovulatory Women.Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2017; 34: 1325-1331https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-017-0983-6
- Using Ejaculated, Fresh, and Frozen-Thawed Epididymal and Testicular Spermatozoa Gives Rise to Comparable Results after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.Fertility and Sterility. 1995; 63: 808-815https://doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57486-x
- Efficacy of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Using Intentionally Cryopreserved Epididymal Spermatozoa.Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 1996; 11: 133-138https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019006
- Fertilization and Pregnancy Outcome with Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection for Azoospermic Men.Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 1999; 14: 741-748https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.3.741
- Treatment of Male Infertility.Methods in Molecular Biology (Clifton, N.J.). 2014; 1154: 385-405https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0659-8_18
- Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) in Extreme Cases of Male Infertility.PLoS ONE. 2014; 9https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113671
- Does Cryopreservation of Sperm Affect Fertilization in Nonobstructive Azoospermia or Cryptozoospermia?.Fertility and Sterility. 2017; 107: 1148-1152https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.009
- Effects of Cryopreservation on Testicular Sperm Nuclear DNA Fragmentation and Its Relationship with Assisted Conception Outcome Following ICSI with Testicular Spermatozoa.Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2003; 7: 449-455https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)61889-5
- No Differences in Outcome after Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection with Fresh or with Frozen–Thawed Epididymal Spermatozoa.Human Reproduction. 1999; 14: 90-95https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.1.90
- Outcomes in Couples Undergoing ICSI: Comparison between Fresh and Frozen–Thawed Surgically Retrieved Spermatozoa.International Journal of Andrology. 2005; 28: 343-349https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00559.x
- Results of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection with Ejaculated, Fresh and Frozen-Thawed Epididymal and Testicular Spermatozoa.Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 1998; 13: 134-142https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/13.suppl_1.134
- Quality of frozen-thawed testicular sperm and its preclinical use for intracytoplasmic sperm injection into in vitro-matured germinal-vesicle stage oocytes.Fertility and Sterility. 1997; 67: 74-80https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)81859-6
- Comparison of Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Outcome with Fresh versus Frozen-Thawed Testicular Sperm in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2018; 35: 1247-1257https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1206-5
Dr Steven Spandorfer is Associate Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Medicine at the Ronald O Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine at Weill Cornell Medical College. A renowned reproductive medicine specialist, he is board certified in both obstetrics and gynaecology and reproductive endocrinology and infertility.
IVF and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using frozen ejaculated spermatozoa results in poorer pregnancy outcomes compared with cycles using fresh ejaculated spermatozoa in couples with non-male factor infertility. Our study suggests that fresh ejaculated spermatozoa may be preferable in IVF-ICSI cycles in patients with non-male factor infertility.
Published online: October 03, 2021
Accepted: September 24, 2021
Received in revised form: August 29, 2021
Received: March 11, 2021Declaration: The authors report no financial or commercial conflicts of interest.
© 2021 Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.