Advertisement
Article| Volume 44, ISSUE 5, P943-950, May 2022

Download started.

Ok

Why fertility preservation rates of transgender men are much lower than those of transgender women

  • Sharon Alpern
    Affiliations
    Sara Racine IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, (affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel), Tel Aviv, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Iris Yaish
    Affiliations
    Institute of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Hypertension, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, (affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel), Tel Aviv, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Gal Wagner-Kolasko
    Affiliations
    Department of Family Medicine, Tel Aviv District, Clalit Gan Meir LGBT Clinic, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yona Greenman
    Affiliations
    Institute of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Hypertension, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, (affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel), Tel Aviv, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Yael Sofer
    Affiliations
    Institute of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Hypertension, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, (affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel), Tel Aviv, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Dror Paltiel Lifshitz
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sheba Medical Center, (affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel), Tel Hashomer, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Asnat Groutz
    Affiliations
    Sara Racine IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, (affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel), Tel Aviv, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Foad Azem
    Affiliations
    Sara Racine IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, (affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel), Tel Aviv, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
  • Hadar Amir
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Sara Racine IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lis Maternity Hospital, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, (affiliated to the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel), Tel Aviv, Israel
    Search for articles by this author
Published:January 13, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.01.003

      Abstract

      Research question

      What are the fertility preservation rates of transgender women and transgender men, and what are the factors that affect their decision-making?

      Design

      This prospective study included 97 transgender women and 91 transgender men referred to the Gender Clinic of the study medical centre's Endocrinology Institute and to the Gan Meir Community Health Care Centre. The responders completed a 28-item questionnaire during 2018.

      Results

      Most of the transgender women and transgender men wished to parent a child (67.4% and 61.9%, respectively, P = 0.447), but only 40.4% of the transgender women and 5.8% of the transgender men used fertility preservation (P < 0.001). The main reasons for not pursuing fertility preservation were unwillingness to postpone gender-affirming treatment (58.8% and 74.0%, respectively, P = 0.076), preference to adopt a child (58.8% and 60.9%, respectively, P = 0.818) and cost (44.9% and 60.9%, respectively, P = 0.086). Factors related to the fertility preservation process itself were specifically chosen by transgender men compared with transgender women as the reason for not pursuing this treatment, including distress caused by the fertility preservation technique (60.3% versus 29.3%, respectively, P = 0.006), fear of gender dysphoria caused by hormonal treatment (63.5% versus 28.3%, P = 0.002) and concern over the attitude of medical staff (44% versus 19%, P = 0.027).

      Conclusions

      Fertility preservation rates were considerably lower among transgender men than transgender women, strongly related to the fertility preservation process itself. Finding ways to overcome the obstacles confronted by transgender individuals, especially transgender men, will enhance their future biological parenting.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Reproductive BioMedicine Online
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ainsworth A.J.
        • Allyse M.
        • Khan Z.
        Fertility preservation for transgender individuals: a review.
        Mayo. Clin. Proc. 2020; 95: 784-792
        • Amir H.
        • Yaish I.
        • Oren A.
        • Groutz A.
        • Greenman Y.
        • Azem F.
        Fertility preservation rates among transgender women compared with transgender men receiving comprehensive fertility counselling.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2020; 41: 546-554
        • Baram S.
        • Myers S.A.
        • Yee S.
        • Librach C.L.
        Fertility preservation for transgender adolescents and young adults: a systematic review.
        Hum. Reprod. Update. 2019; 25: 694-716
        • Besse M.
        • Lampe N.M.
        • Mann E.S.
        Experiences with achieving pregnancy and giving birth among transgender men: a narrative literature review.
        Yale J. Biol. Med. 2020; 93: 517-528
        • Brik T.
        • Vrouenraets L.J.J.J.
        • Schagen S.E.E.
        • Meissner A.
        • de Vries M.C.
        • Hannema S.E.
        Use of fertility preservation among a cohort of transgirls in the Netherlands.
        J. Adolesc. Health. 2019; 64: 589-593
        • Chen D.
        • Kyweluk M.A.
        • Sajwani A.
        • Gordon E.J.
        • Johnson E.K.
        • Finlayson C.A.
        • Woodruff T.K.
        Factors affecting fertility decision-making among transgender adolescents and young adults.
        LGBT Health. 2019; 6: 107-115
        • Cheng P.J.
        • Pastuszak A.W.
        • Myers J.B.
        • Goodwin I.A.
        • Hotaling J.M.
        Fertility concerns of the transgender patient.
        Transl. Androl. Urol. 2019; 8: 209-218
        • Chiniara L.N.
        • Viner C.
        • Palmert M.
        • Bonifacio H.
        Perspectives on fertility preservation and parenthood among transgender youth and their parents.
        Arch. Dis. Child. 2019; 104: 739-744
        • Cho K.
        • Harjee R.
        • Roberts J.
        • Dunne C.
        Fertility preservation in a transgender man without prolonged discontinuation of testosterone: a case report and literature review.
        F and S Reports. 2020; 1: 43-47
        • Coleman E.
        • Bockting W.
        • Botzer M.
        • Cohen-Kettenis P.
        • DeCuypere G.
        • Feldman J.
        • Fraser L.
        • Green J.
        • Knudson G.
        • Meyer W.J.
        • Monstrey S.
        • Adler R.K.
        • Brown G.R.
        • Devor A.H.
        • Ehrbar R.
        • Ettner R.
        • Eyler E.
        • Garofalo R.
        • Karasic D.H.
        • Lev A.I.
        • Mayer G.
        • Meyer-Bahlburg H.
        • Hall B.P.
        • Pfaefflin F.
        • Rachlin K.
        • Robinson B.
        • Schechter L.S.
        • Tangpricha V.
        • van Trotsenburg M.
        • Vitale A.
        • Winter S.
        • Whittle S.
        • Wylie K.R.
        • Zucker K.
        Standards of care for the health of transsexual, transgender, and gender-nonconforming people, version 7.
        Int. J. Transgend. 2012; 13: 165-232
        • Deutsch M.B.
        • Feldman J.L.
        Updated recommendations from the world professional association for transgender health standards of care.
        Am. Fam. Physician. 2013; 87: 89-93
        • De Wert G.
        • Dondorp W.
        • Shenfield F.
        • Barri P.
        • Devroey P.
        • Diedrich K.
        • Tarlatzis B.
        • Provoost V.
        • Pennings G.
        ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 23: medically assisted reproduction in singles, lesbian and gay couples, and transsexual people.
        Hum. Reprod. 2014; 29: 1859-1865
        • Edwards-Leeper L.
        • Spack N.P.
        Psychological evaluation and medical treatment of transgender youth in an interdisciplinary ‘Gender Management Service’ (GeMS) in a major pediatric center.
        J. Homosex. 2012; 59: 321-336
        • Ethics Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Access to fertility services by transgender persons: an Ethics Committee opinion.
        Fertil. Steril. 2015; 104: 1111-1115
        • Feigerlová E.
        • Pascal V.
        • Ganne-Devonec M.O.
        • Klein M.
        • Guerci B.
        Fertility desires and reproductive needs of transgender people: challenges and considerations for clinical practice.
        Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.). 2019; 91: 10-21
        • Gale J.
        • Magee B.
        • Forsyth-Greig A.
        • Visram H.
        • Jackson A.
        Oocyte cryopreservation in a transgender man on long-term testosterone therapy: a case report.
        F and S Reports. 2021; 2: 249-251
        • Hembree W.C.
        • Cohen-Kettenis P.T.
        • Gooren L.
        • Hannema S.E.
        • Meyer W.J.
        • Murad M.H.
        • Rosenthal S.M.
        • Safer J.D.
        • Tangpricha V.
        • T'Sjoen G.G.
        Endocrine treatment of gender-dysphoric/gender-incongruent persons: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline.
        J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017; 102: 3869-3903
        • Kirubarajan A.
        • Patel P.
        • Leung S.
        • Park B.
        • Sierra S.
        Cultural competence in fertility care for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer people: a systematic review of patient and provider perspectives.
        Fertil. Steril. 2021; 115: 1294-1301
        • Kreukels B.P.
        • Haraldsen I.R.
        • De Cuypere G.
        • Richter-Appelt H.
        • Gijs L.
        • Cohen-Kettenis P.T.
        A European network for the investigation of gender incongruence: the ENIGI initiative.
        Eur. Psychiatry. 2012; 27: 445-450
        • Morrison A.
        • Olezeski C.
        • Cron J.
        • Kallen A.N.
        A pilot study to assess attitudes toward future fertility and parenthood in transgender and gender expansive adolescents.
        Transgender Health. 2020; 5: 129-137
        • Murad M.H.
        • Elamin M.B.
        • Garcia M.Z.
        • Mullan R.J.
        • Murad A.
        • Erwin P.J.
        • Montori V.M.
        Hormonal therapy and sex reassignment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of quality of life and psychosocial outcomes.
        Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.). 2010; 72: 214-231
        • OECD
        Education at a Glance.
        OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, Paris2018https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en
        • Olson J.
        • Schrager S.M.
        • Belzer M.
        • Simons L.K.
        • Clark L.F.
        Baseline physiologic and psychosocial characteristics of transgender youth seeking care for gender dysphoria.
        J. Adolesc. Health. 2015; 57: 374-380
        • Pang K.C.
        • Peri A.J.S.
        • Chung H.E.
        • Telfer M.
        • Elder C.V.
        • Grover S.
        • Jayasinghe Y.
        Rates of fertility preservation use among transgender adolescents.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2020; 174: 890-891
        • Schwartz A.R.
        • Moravek M.B.
        Reproductive potential and fertility preservation in transgender and nonbinary individuals.
        Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021; 33: 327-334
        • Sundaram V.
        • Mok-Lin E.
        Fertility preservation for the transgender individual.
        Curr. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020; 9: 129-137
        • Voultsos P.
        • Zymvragou C.E.
        • Karakasi M.V.
        • Pavlidis P.
        A qualitative study examining transgender people's attitudes towards having a child to whom they are genetically related and pursuing fertility treatments in Greece.
        BMC Public Health. 2021; 21: 378
        • Winter S.
        • Diamond M.
        • Green J.
        • Karasic D.
        • Reed T.
        • Whittle S.
        • Wylie K.
        Transgender people: health at the margins of society.
        Lancet. 2016; 388: 390-400
        • Yan M.
        • Bustos S.S.
        • Kuruoglu D.
        • Ciudad P.
        • Forte A.J.
        • Kim E.A.
        • Del Corral G.
        • Manrique O.J.
        Systematic review of fertility preservation options in transgender patients: a guide for plastic surgeons.
        Ann. Transl. Med. 2021; 9: 613-625

      Biography

      Sharon Alpern received her BSc from the Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel. She completed her MD at Tel-Aviv University, Israel, and is currently a Senior Gynecology Resident at the Sourasky Medical Center, Israel. Dr Alpern has a special interest in reproductive endocrinology, infertility and fertility preservation.
      Key message
      Fertility preservation rates of transgender individuals are low, with much lower rates among transgender men. Factors related to the fertility preservation process itself were implicated in these low rates. Overcoming the obstacles confronted by transgender individuals, especially transgender men, will facilitate their fertility preservation and enhance their biological parenting rate.