Advertisement

Male and female blastocysts: any difference other than the sex?

      Highlights

      • Comparing embryos, more males than females develop to the blastocyst stage.
      • Male blastocysts exhibit a higher aneuploidy rate.
      • The live birth rate is similar between male and female single blastocyst transfers.

      ABSTRACT

      Research question

      Is there any imbalance in the sex ratio at the blastocyst stage of human embryos? And what is the sex ratio in euploid, transferred, implanted blastocysts and at birth?

      Design

      Embryos from 646 women undergoing 921 preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) cycles from September 2017 to February 2020 were included. Data from the chromosomal constitution of 2637 biopsied blastocysts were retrospectively analysed. Trophectoderm samples were analysed by next-generation sequencing. Embryos were categorized as euploid, mosaic or aneuploid. A total of 548 blastocysts diagnosed as euploid were warmed and transferred in a subsequent single-embryo transfer cycle.

      Results

      The blastocyst sex ratio was skewed in favour of male sex with 53.1% (1401/2637) of blastocysts diagnosed as male and 46.9% (1236/2637) as female (sex ratio 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.22). Following biopsy and PGT-A, 41.2% (1086/2637) of blastocysts were classified as euploid, 7.7% (202/2637) as mosaic and 51.2% (1349/2637) as aneuploid. More chromosome euploidy was observed among female than male blastocysts (adjusted odds ratio 1.29, 95% CI 1.08–1.55) after adjusting for female age, male age and gonadotrophin dose. Euploid blastocysts were comparable between the sexes (sex ratio 0.99, 95% CI 0.88–1.11). No significant differences were observed between the sexes in implantation (sex ratio 0.86, 95% CI 0.68–1.08), miscarriage (sex ratio 1, 95% CI 0.51–1.97) or live birth rate (sex ratio 0.85, 95% CI 0.66–1.08).

      Conclusions

      More male than female embryos develop to the blastocyst stage. Male blastocysts exhibit a higher aneuploidy rate. The capacity to implant and lead to a live birth is similar between the sexes.

      Key words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Reproductive BioMedicine Online
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Alfarawati S.
        • Fragouli E.
        • Colls P.
        • Stevens J.
        • Gutiérrez-Mateo C.
        • Schoolcraft W.B.
        • Katz-Jaffe M.G.
        • Wells D.
        The relationship between blastocyst morphology, chromosomal abnormality, and embryo gender.
        Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95: 520-524https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.003
        • Arikawa M.
        • Jwa S.C.
        • Kuwahara A.
        • Irahara M.
        • Saito H.
        Effect of semen quality on human sex ratio in in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an analysis of 27,158 singleton infants born after fresh single-embryo transfer.
        Fertil. Steril. 2016; 105: 897-904https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.12.009
        • Barri P.N.
        • Martinez F.
        • Coroleu B.
        • Tur R.
        The role of GnRH antagonists in assisted reproduction.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2002; 5: 14-19
        • Boada M.
        • Carrera M.
        • De La Iglesia C.
        • Sandalinas M.
        • Barri P.N.
        • Veiga A.
        Successful Use of a Laser for Human Embryo Biopsy in Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis: Report of Two Cases.
        J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 1998; 15: 302-307https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022548612107
        • Bu Z.
        • Chen Z.-J.
        • Huang G.
        • Zhang H.
        • Wu Q.
        • Ma Y.
        • Shi J.
        • Xu Y.
        • Zhang S.
        • Zhang C.
        • Zhao X.
        • Zhang B.
        • Huang Y.
        • Sun Z.
        • Kang Y.
        • Wu R.
        • Wu X.
        • Sun H.
        • Sun Y.
        Live birth sex ratio after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in China–an analysis of 121,247 babies from 18 centers.
        PloS One. 2014; 9e113522https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0113522
        • Chang H.J.
        • Lee J.R.
        • Jee B.C.
        • Suh C.S.
        • Kim S.H.
        Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Fertil. Steril. 2009; 91: 2381-2390https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.066
        • Cirkel C.
        • König I.R.
        • Schultze-Mosgau A.
        • Beck E.
        • Neumann K.
        • Griesinger G.
        The use of intracytoplasmic sperm injection is associated with a shift in the secondary sex ratio.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2018; 37: 703-708https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.09.009
        • Coll L.
        • Parriego M.
        • Mateo S.
        • García-Monclús S.
        • Rodríguez I.
        • Boada M.
        • Coroleu B.
        • Polyzos N.P.
        • Vidal F.
        • Veiga A.
        Prevalence, types and possible factors influencing mosaicism in IVF blastocysts: results from a single setting.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2021; 42: 55-65https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.09.025
        • Csokmay J.M.
        • Hill M.J.
        • Cioppettini F.V.
        • Miller K.A.
        • Scott R.T.
        • Frattarelli J.L.
        Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer.
        Fertil. Steril. 2009; 92: 913-917https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1741
        • Cuevas I.
        • Pons Gatell M.C.
        • Cuadros Vargas M.
        • Delgado Mendive A.
        • Rives Enedáguila N.
        • Moragas Solanes M.
        • Carrasco Canal B.
        • Teruel López J.
        • Busquets Bonet A.
        • Hurtado de Mendoza Acosta M.V.
        The Embryology Interest Group: updating ASEBIR's morphological scoring system for early embryos, morulae and blastocysts.
        Med. Reprod. Embriología Clínica. 2018; 5: 42-54https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medre.2017.11.002
        • Dean J.H.
        • Chapman M.G.
        • Sullivan E.A.
        The effect on human sex ratio at birth by assisted reproductive technology (ART) procedures – an assessment of babies born following single embryo transfers, Australia and New Zealand, 2002–2006.
        BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010; 117: 1628-1634https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02731.x
        • Eaton J.L.
        • Hacker M.R.
        • Barrett C.B.
        • Thornton K.L.
        • Penzias A.S.
        Influence of embryo sex on development to the blastocyst stage and euploidy.
        Fertil. Steril. 2011; 95: 936-939https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.063
        • Gardner D.K.
        • Schoolcraft W.B.
        In vitro culture of human blastocyst.
        in: Jansen R. Mortimer D. Towards Reproductive Certainty: Infertility and Genetics beyond 1999. Parthenon Press, Carnforth1999: 378-388
        • Gardner D.K.
        • Wale P.L.
        • Collins R.
        • Lane M.
        Glucose consumption of single post-compaction human embryos is predictive of embryo sex and live birth outcome.
        Hum. Reprod. 2011; 26: 1981-1986https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der143
        • Graffelman J.
        • Fugger E.F.
        • Keyvanfar K.
        • Schulman J.D.
        Human live birth and sperm–sex ratios compared.
        Hum. Reprod. 1999; 14: 2917-2920https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.11.2917
        • Hentemann M.A.
        • Briskemyr S.
        • Bertheussen K.
        Blastocyst transfer and gender: IVF versus ICSI.
        J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2009; 26: 433-436https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9337-3
        • Kuwayama M.
        • Vajta G.
        • Ieda S.
        • Kato O.
        Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2005; 11: 608-614
      1. Larson, M.A., Kimura, K., Kubisch, H.M., Roberts, R.M., 2001. Sexual dimorphism among bovine embryos in their ability to make the transition to expanded blastocyst and in the expression of the signaling molecule IFN-τ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 98, 9677–9682. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.171305398

        • Luna M.
        • Duke M.
        • Copperman A.
        • Grunfeld L.
        • Sandler B.
        • Barritt J.
        Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring.
        Fertil. Steril. 2007; 87: 519-523https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.058
        • Maurer M.
        • Ebner T.
        • Puchner M.
        • Mayer R.B.
        • Shebl O.
        • Oppelt P.
        • Duba H.-C.
        Chromosomal Aneuploidies and Early Embryonic Developmental Arrest.
        Int. J. Fertil. Steril. 2015; 9: 346-353https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2015.4550
        • Ménézo Y.J.R.
        • Chouteau J.
        • Torelló M.J.
        • Girard A.
        • Veiga A.
        Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans.
        Fertil. Steril. 1999; 72: 221-224https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(99)00256-3
        • Moutos C.P.
        • Kearns W.G.
        • Farmer S.E.
        • Richards J.P.
        • Saad A.F.
        • Crochet J.R.
        Embryo quality, ploidy, and transfer outcomes in male versus female blastocysts.
        J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2021; 38: 2363-2370https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02250-w
        • Narvaez J.L.
        • Chang J.
        • Boulet S.L.
        • Davies M.J.
        • Kissin D.M.
        Trends and correlates of the sex distribution among U.S. assisted reproductive technology births.
        Fertil. Steril. 2019; 112: 305-314https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.03.034
        • Orzack S.H.
        • Stubblefield J.W.
        • Akmaev V.R.
        • Colls P.
        • Munné S.
        • Scholl T.
        • Steinsaltz D.
        • Zuckerman J.E.
        The human sex ratio from conception to birth.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2015; 112: E2102-E2111https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1416546112
        • Patrat C.
        • Ouimette J.-F.
        • Rougeulle C.
        X chromosome inactivation in human development.
        Dev. Camb. Engl. 2020; 147https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.183095
        • Pergament E.
        • Todydemir P.B.
        • Fiddler M.
        Sex ratio: a biological perspective of ‘Sex and the City.’.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2002; 5: 43-46
        • Ray P.F.
        • Conaghan J.
        • Winston R.M.
        • Handyside A.H.
        Increased number of cells and metabolic activity in male human preimplantation embryos following in vitro fertilization.
        J. Reprod. Fertil. 1995; 104: 165-171https://doi.org/10.1530/jrf.0.1040165
      2. Spanish Fertility Society, 2021. Comisión Nacional de Reproducción Humana Asistida - Información del Registro Nacional de Actividad de años anteriores,” n.d) (www.registrosef.com)

        • Supramaniam P.R.
        • Mittal M.
        • Ohuma E.O.
        • Lim L.N.
        • McVeigh E.
        • Granne I.
        • Becker C.M.
        Secondary sex ratio in assisted reproduction: an analysis of 1 376 454 treatment cycles performed in the UK.
        Hum. Reprod. Open. 2019; 2019: hoz020https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoz020
        • Tan K.
        • An L.
        • Miao K.
        • Ren L.
        • Hou Z.
        • Tao L.
        • Zhang Z.
        • Wang X.
        • Xia W.
        • Liu J.
        • Wang Z.
        • Xi G.
        • Gao S.
        • Sui L.
        • Zhu D.-S.
        • Wang S.
        • Wu Z.
        • Bach I.
        • Chen D.-B.
        • Tian J.
        Impaired imprinted X chromosome inactivation is responsible for the skewed sex ratio following in vitro fertilization.
        Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016; 113: 3197-3202https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1523538113
        • Tan K.
        • Wang Z.
        • Zhang Z.
        • An L.
        • Tian J.
        IVF affects embryonic development in a sex-biased manner in mice.
        REPRODUCTION. 2016; 151: 443-453https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-15-0588
        • Tarín J.J.
        • García-Pérez M.A.
        • Hermenegildo C.
        • Cano A.
        Changes in sex ratio from fertilization to birth in assisted-reproductive-treatment cycles.
        Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. RBE. 2014; 12: 56https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-12-56
        • Veiga A.
        • Sandalinas M.
        • Benkhalifa M.
        • Boada M.
        • Carrera M.
        • Santaló J.
        • Barri P.N.
        • Ménézo Y.
        Laser blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation diagnosis in the human.
        Zygote. 1997; 5: 351-354
        • Viloria T.
        • Rubio M.C.
        • Rodrigo L.
        • Calderon G.
        • Mercader A.
        • Mateu E.
        • Meseguer M.
        • Remohi J.
        • Pellicer A.
        Smoking habits of parents and male: female ratio in spermatozoa and preimplantation embryos.
        Hum. Reprod. 2005; 20: 2517-2522https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei087
        • Wang A.
        • Kort J.
        • Behr B.
        • Westphal L.M.
        Euploidy in relation to blastocyst sex and morphology.
        J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2018; 35: 1565-1572https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1262-x
        • Zhu J.
        • Zhuang X.
        • Chen L.
        • Liu P.
        • Qiao J.
        Effect of embryo culture media on percentage of males at birth.
        Hum. Reprod. Oxf. Engl. 2015; 30: 1039-1045https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev049

      Biography

      Beatriz Carrasco received her degree in Biology from Córdoba University and her Master's degree in Assisted Human Reproduction also from Córdoba University. She is a Senior Embryologist in the IVF laboratory of the Dexeus University Hospital, Spain, and an active member of the Spanish Association for the Study of Reproductive Biology (ASEBIR).
      Key message
      After in-vitro culture, more male embryos develop to the blastocyst stage compared with female ones. However, male blastocysts exhibit a higher aneuploidy rate. The capacity to implant and to give rise to a live birth is similar between the sexes after euploid blastocyst transfer.