Advertisement
Research Article|Articles in Press

Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: The African Network and Registry for ART, 2018 and 2019

Published:January 26, 2023DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.01.014

      Abstract

      Research question

      What were the utilization, practices and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Africa in 2018 and 2019?

      Design

      Cycle-based data (CBD) and retrospective summary data were collected cross-sectionally from voluntarily participating ART centres.

      Results

      During 2018, 43,958 ART procedures were reported by 67 centres in 16 countries, increasing to 45,185 procedures reported by 70 centres in 18 countries in 2019. Autologous fresh procedures predominated at 70%, whereas autologous frozen embryo transfers (FET) increased from 21.2% to 23.1% and oocyte donation cycles remained below 10%. In 2019, the mean age of women undergoing autologous fresh embryo transfer was 33.9 years and received a mean number of 2.4 embryos per transfer. The clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per fresh embryo transfer was 42.8% in 2018 and 38.4% in 2019, with corresponding rates of 38.3% and 31.8% after FET. In both years, most ART procedures, excluding single embryo transfer (SET), were associated with a multiple delivery rate above 20%, reaching over 30% after elective dual embryo transfer in autologous cycles and after fresh oocyte donation. Multiples were predominantly born preterm with a substantially increased perinatal mortality rate. The CBD for both years showed that elective SET (eSET) achieved a high CPR without compromising safety.

      Conclusion

      This third report of The African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology documents the prevailing practice of multiple embryo transfers in a cohort of relatively young women while highlighting the importance of disaggregating eSET, non-eSET and double embryo transfer. The high CPR after eSET and the increase in cryopreservation cycles are encouraging trends towards decreasing the number of embryos transferred without compromising effectiveness. Improved follow-up of ART pregnancies is required.

      KEYWORDS

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Reproductive BioMedicine Online
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Aftab F.
        • Ahmed I.
        • Ahmed S.
        • Ali SM.
        • Amenga-Etego S.
        • Ariff S.
        • Bahl R.
        • Baqui AH.
        • Begum N.
        • Bhutta ZA.
        • Biemba G.
        Direct maternal morbidity and the risk of pregnancy-related deaths, stillbirths, and neonatal deaths in South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa: A population-based prospective cohort study in 8 countries.
        PLoS medicine. 2021; 18e1003644https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003644
        • Chambers GM.
        • Keller E.
        • Choi S.
        • Khalaf Y.
        • Crawford S.
        • Botha W.
        • Ledger W.
        Funding and public reporting strategies for reducing multiple pregnancy from fertility treatments.
        Fertil. Steril. 2020; 114: 715-721https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1405
        • Chambers GM.
        • Dyer S.
        • Zegers-Hochschild F.
        • de Mouzon J.
        • Ishihara O.
        • Banker M.
        • Mansour R.
        • Kupka MS.
        • Adamson GD.
        International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies World Report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014.
        Hum. Reprod. 2021; 36: 2921-2934https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab198
        • Dyer S.
        • Archary P.
        • de Mouzon J.
        • Fiadjoe M.
        • Ashiru O.
        Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: first results from the African Network and Registry for Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2013.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2019; 38: 216-224https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.11.001
        • Dyer S.
        • Archary P.
        • Potgieter L.
        • Smit I.
        • Ashiru O.
        • Bell EG.
        Assisted reproductive technology in Africa: a 5-year trend analysis from the African Network and Registry for ART.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2020; 41 (1): 604-615https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.021
        • Dyer S.
        • Chambers GM.
        • Adamson GD.
        • Banker M.
        • De Mouzon J.
        • Ishihara O.
        • Kupka M.
        • Mansour R.
        Zegers-Hochschild, F. ART utilization: an indicator of access to infertility care.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2020; 41 (1): 6-9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.03.007
        • Starrs AM.
        • Ezeh AC.
        • Barker G.
        • Basu A.
        • Bertrand JT.
        • Blum R.
        • Coll-Seck AM.
        • Grover A.
        • Laski L.
        • Roa M.
        • Sathar ZA.
        Accelerate progress—sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher–Lancet Commission.
        Lancet. 2018; 391: 2642-2692https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9
        • Dyer SJ.
        • Sherwood K.
        • McIntyre D.
        • Ataguba JE.
        Catastrophic payment for assisted reproduction techniques with conventional ovarian stimulation in the public health sector of South Africa: frequency and coping strategies.
        Hum. Reprod. 2013; 28: 2755-2764https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det290
        • Serour GI.
        • Serour AG.
        The impact of religion and culture on medically assisted reproduction in the Middle East and Europe.
        Reprod. Biomed. Online. 2021; 43: 421-433https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.06.002
        • Tesfa D.
        • Tiruneh SA.
        • Azanaw MM.
        • Gebremariam AD.
        • Engdaw MT.
        • Kefale B.
        • Abebe B.
        • Dessalegn T.
        Time to death and its determinants among under-five children in Sub-Saharan Africa using the recent (2010–2018) demographic and health survey data: country-based shared frailty analyses.
        BMC Pediatr. 2021; 21: 515https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02950-3
        • Inhorn M.
        • Patrizio P.
        Infertility around the globe: new thinking on gender, reproductive technologies and global movements in the 21st century.
        Hum Reprod Update. 2015; 21: 411-426https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmv016
        • Kemper JM.
        • Wang R.
        • Rolnik DL.
        • Mol BW.
        Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: are we examining the correct outcomes?.
        Hum. Reprod. 2020; 35: 2408-2412https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaa224
        • World Health Organization (WHO)
        Infertility Fact Sheet.
        WHO, Geneva2020 (Accessible at)
        • Wyns C.
        • De Geyter C.
        • Calhaz-Jorge C.
        • Kupka MS.
        • Motrenko T.
        • Smeenk J.
        • Bergh C.
        • Tandler-Schneider A.
        • Rugescu IA.
        • Vidakovic S.
        2017: results generated from European registries by ESHRE.
        Hum. Reprod. Open. 2021; 2021: hoab026https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoab026
        • Zegers-Hochschild F.
        • Adamson G.D.
        • Dyer S.
        • Racowsky C.
        • de Mouzon J.
        • Sokol R.
        • Rienzi L.
        • Sunde A.
        • Schmidt L.
        • Cooke I.D.
        • Simpson J.L.
        The International Glossary on Infertility and Fertility Care, 2017.
        Hum. Reprod. 2017; 32: 1786-1801https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dex234
        • Zegers-Hochschild F.
        • Crosby J.A.
        • Musri C.
        • de Souza M.D.
        • Martínez A.G.
        • Silva A.A.
        • Mojarra J.M.
        • Masoli D.
        • Posada N.
        Assisted reproductive technologies in Latin America: the Latin American Registry. 2019.
        Reprod. BioMed. 2022; (OnlineMar 12)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.02.026

      Biography

      Paversan Archary is Clinical Assistant of the African Network and Registry for ART, and regional contributor to the International Committee for Monitoring ART. He is a clinician and academic researcher at 2 Military Hospital, and Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town. His work and research focus on ART data surveillance in Africa.
      Key message
      Registry data from ART procedures (2018, 2019; 18 countries) from the African Network and Registry for ART, integral to widening access to quality care in Africa. The findings of sound ART effectiveness, including in cases of single embryo transfer, a young patient population and high multiple pregnancy rates, are evident.