x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Editor
- Research ArticleRemove Research Article filter
- Ovarian stimulationRemove Ovarian stimulation filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2017 and 2022.
Author
- Alsbjerg, Birgit1
- Arcos, Josep Lluis1
- Bellver, Jose1
- Cerquides, Jesus1
- Chen, Miaoxin1
- Correa, Nuria1
- de Castro, Gonzalo1
- Domingo, Javier1
- Elbaek, Helle Olesen1
- García-Velasco, Juan A1
- Garrido, Nicolás1
- Gordon, Yasmyn E1
- Haahr, Thor1
- Heilbronn, Leonie K1
- Humaidan, Peter1
- Laursen, Rita Jakubcionyte1
- Lorenzo, Isabel1
- Muñoz, Elkin1
- Pellicer, Antonio1
- Povlsen, Betina Boel1
- Robker, Rebecca L1
- Vassena, Rita1
- Wong, Siew L1
- Wu, Linda L1
- Yding Andersen, Claus1
Editor's Choice
4 Results
- Article
Supporting first FSH dosage for ovarian stimulation with machine learning
Reproductive BioMedicine OnlineVol. 45Issue 5p1039–1045Published online: June 18, 2022- Nuria Correa
- Jesus Cerquides
- Josep Lluis Arcos
- Rita Vassena
Cited in Scopus: 0Although significant strides have been made in the last 40 years, the mean pregnancy rate after an IVF cycle still hovers around 30%, with a 20% chance of delivery (De Geyter et al., 2018). An important requisite to the success of an IVF cycle is the availability of a certain number of mature oocytes (metaphase III [MII]); usually obtained after ovarian stimulation. - Article
Ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification does not modify disease-free survival and overall survival rates in patients with early breast cancer
Reproductive BioMedicine OnlineVol. 39Issue 5p860–867Published online: July 10, 2019- Elkin Muñoz
- Javier Domingo
- Gonzalo De Castro
- Isabel Lorenzo
- Juan A. García-Velasco
- Jose Bellver
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 6Does ovarian stimulation for oocyte vitrification affect disease-free survival and overall survival rates in women with early breast cancer? - Article
Differential impacts of gonadotrophins, IVF and embryo culture on mouse blastocyst development
Reproductive BioMedicine OnlineVol. 39Issue 3p372–382Published online: March 12, 2019- Miaoxin Chen
- Siew L Wong
- Linda L Wu
- Yasmyn E Gordon
- Leonie K Heilbronn
- Rebecca L Robker
Cited in Scopus: 7Conception via assisted reproductive technology (ART) increases the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease in adulthood. Underlying differences between ART-conceived and in-vivo-conceived embryos that contribute to this increased risk are, however, not known. - Article
Bio-equivalent doses of recombinant HCG and recombinant LH during ovarian stimulation result in similar oestradiol output: a randomized controlled study
Reproductive BioMedicine OnlineVol. 35Issue 2p232–238Published online: May 11, 2017- Birgit Alsbjerg
- Helle Olesen Elbaek
- Rita Jakubcionyte Laursen
- Betina Boel Povlsen
- Thor Haahr
- Claus Yding Andersen
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 0In nature, HCG is secreted by the implanting embryo from peri-implantation and onwards. In contrast, LH is mandatory for steroidogenesis and follicular development during the follicular phase, working in synergy with FSH. Moreover, LH is mandatory for the function of the corpus luteum. Although LH and HCG bind to the same receptor, significant molecular, structural and functional differences exist, inducing differences in bioactivity. This randomized controlled study compared the effect of recombinant FSH stimulation combined with daily either micro-dose recombinant HCG or recombinant LH supplementation in a 1:1 bioactivity ratio from day 1 of stimulation in a long gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist down regulation protocol.