x
Filter:
Filters applied
- Editor
- Cumulative live birth rateRemove Cumulative live birth rate filter
Publication Date
Please choose a date range between 2021 and 2022.
Editor's Choice
2 Results
- Article
Comparison of predictive models for cumulative live birth rate after treatment with ART
Reproductive BioMedicine OnlineVol. 45Issue 2p246–255Published online: March 31, 2022- Léna Bardet
- Jean-Baptiste Excoffier
- Noemie Salaun-Penquer
- Matthieu Ortala
- Maud Pasquier
- Emmanuelle Mathieu d'Argent
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 0Can a machine learning model better predict the cumulative live birth rate for a couple after intrauterine insemination or embryo transfer than Cox regression based on their personal characteristics? - Article
Clinical outcomes and utilization from over a decade of planned oocyte cryopreservation
Reproductive BioMedicine OnlineVol. 43Issue 4p671–679Published online: July 1, 2021- Angela Q. Leung
- Katherine Baker
- Denis Vaughan
- Jaimin S. Shah
- Ann Korkidakis
- David A. Ryley
- and others
Cited in Scopus: 9An age-related decline in fertility is a well-known physiologic effect related to decreases in oocyte quantity and quality (ACOG and ASRM, 2014). Older women who conceive naturally have an increased risk of fetal chromosomal abnormalities and pregnancy loss (Spandorfer and Chung, 2004). Despite this association, a global shift towards delayed childbearing has occurred (OECD Family Database, OECD, 2019). Age at first birth and the proportion of pregnancies in women over the age of 35 years have been increasing in the USA since 1980 (Martin et al., 2019).